Back

Association between use of aspirin use before hospital admission and sepsis outcomes: a population-based cohort study

Hsu, W.-T.; Porta, L.; Hsu, T.-C.; Chen, S.-C.; Lee, C.-C.

2020-06-11 intensive care and critical care medicine
10.1101/2020.06.09.20126938 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectivesAntiplatelet agents have been shown to reduce serum levels of inflammatory markers and may reduce sepsis mortality. A previous randomized clinical trial did not find that aspirin use after hospitalization, compared with placebo, improve acute respiratory distress syndrome within 7 days. We aimed to examine the association between preadmission use of aspirin and sepsis outcome. MethodsWe conducted a population-based cohort study based on the National Health Insurance Research Database of Taiwan. The association between aspirin use and 90-day mortality in sepsis patients was determined by Cox proportional hazard models, adjusting for either individual covariates or a propensity score. Restricted mean survival time (RMST) analysis was performed as a sensitivity analysis. ResultsOf 52,982 patients with sepsis, 12,776 received preadmission use of aspirin, while 39,081 did not receive any antiplatelets. Use of aspirin before sepsis admission was associated with a decreased risk of 90-day mortality (PS-adjusted HR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.84-0.93). RMST analysis confirmed the beneficial effect of aspirin which was associated with a 2% increase in survival time (RMST ratio 1.02, 95% CI: 1.01-1.03), when compared to nonuse. On PS adjusted analysis, the odds ratios (OR) of respiratory failure with the preadmission use of aspirin was 0.98 (95% CI: 0.93-1.03), but we did not find any significant association between prior aspirin use and respiratory failure. ConclusionsOur study confirms that prehospital aspirin use was associated with a reduced 90-day mortality rate among sepsis patients, but we did not find any substantial association with respiratory or acute renal failure.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.