Back

Estimating excess visual loss in people with neovascular age-related macular degeneration during the COVID-19 pandemic

Thomas, D. S.; Warwick, A.; Olvera-Barrios, A.; Egan, C.; Schwartz, R.; Patra, S.; Eleftheriadis, H.; Khawaja, A. P.; Lotery, A.; Mueller, P. L.; Hamilton, R.; Preston, E.; Taylor, P.; Tufail, A.; UK EMR Users Group,

2020-06-05 ophthalmology
10.1101/2020.06.02.20120642
Show abstract

ObjectivesTo report the reduction in new neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) referrals during the COVID-19 pandemic and estimate the impact of delayed treatment on visual outcomes at one year. DesignRetrospective clinical audit and simulation model. SettingMultiple UK NHS ophthalmology centres. ParticipantsData on the reduction in new nAMD referrals was obtained from four NHS Trusts in England comparing April 2020 to April 2019. To estimate the potential impact on one-year visual outcomes, a stratified bootstrap simulation model was developed drawing on an electronic medical records dataset of 20,825 nAMD eyes from 27 NHS Trusts. Main outcome measuresSimulated mean visual acuity and proportions of eyes with vision [≤]6/60, [≤]6/24 and [≥]6/12 at one year under four hypothetical scenarios: no treatment delay, 3, 6 and 9-month treatment delays. Estimated additional number of eyes with vision [≤]6/60 at one year nationally. ResultsThe number of nAMD referrals at four major eye treatment hospital groups based in England dropped on average by 72% (range 65 to 87%) in April 2020 compared to April 2019. Simulated one-year visual outcomes for 1000 nAMD eyes with a 3-month treatment delay suggested an increase in the proportion of eyes with vision [≤]6/60 from 15.5% (13.2 to 17.9) to 23.3% (20.7 to25.9), and a decrease in the proportion of eyes with vision [≥]6/12 (driving vision) from 35.1% (32.1 to 38.1) to 26.4% (23.8 to29.2). Outcomes worsened incrementally with longer modelled delays. Assuming nAMD referrals are reduced to this level at the national level for only one month, these simulated results suggest an additional 186-365 eyes with vision [≤]6/60 at one-year with even a short treatment delay. ConclusionsWe report a large decrease in nAMD referrals during the first month of COVID-19 lockdown and provide an important public health message regarding the risk of delayed treatment. As a conservative estimate, a treatment delay of 3 months could lead to a >50% relative increase in the number of eyes with vision [≤]6/60 and 25% relative decrease in the number of eyes with driving vision at one year.

Matching journals

1
Eye
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 11 published papers
#1
185× avg
2
British Journal of Ophthalmology
BMJ · based on 13 published papers
Top 0.2%
139× avg
3
Ophthalmology Science
Elsevier BV · based on 15 published papers
Top 0.2%
137× avg
4
BMJ Open
BMJ · based on 553 published papers
Top 10%
3.0× avg
5
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 49%
10.4%
6
Translational Vision Science & Technology
Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO) · based on 18 published papers
Top 0.8%
42× avg
7
F1000Research
F1000 Research Ltd · based on 28 published papers
Top 1.0%
13× avg
8
Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science
Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO) · based on 11 published papers
Top 0.8%
35× avg
9
Clinical and Translational Science
Wiley · based on 14 published papers
Top 1%
15× avg
10
British Journal of Cancer
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 22 published papers
Top 3%
8.7× avg
11
Nature Communications
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 483 published papers
Top 34%
1.4%
12
Scientific Reports
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 701 published papers
Top 77%
1.4%
13
Frontiers in Medicine
Frontiers Media SA · based on 99 published papers
Top 13%
2.1× avg
14
Journal of Medical Internet Research
JMIR Publications Inc. · based on 81 published papers
Top 11%
2.0× avg
15
BMJ
BMJ · based on 49 published papers
Top 6%
3.3× avg
16
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
MDPI AG · based on 116 published papers
Top 21%
0.8%
17
Genetics in Medicine
Elsevier BV · based on 57 published papers
Top 5%
2.1× avg
18
Vaccines
MDPI AG · based on 131 published papers
Top 7%
2.1× avg
19
BMC Medicine
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 155 published papers
Top 25%
0.7%
20
Journal of Medical Genetics
BMJ · based on 22 published papers
Top 2%
9.3× avg
21
CMAJ Open
CMA Impact Inc. · based on 12 published papers
Top 1.0%
13× avg