Back

How Efficient Can Non-Professional MasksSuppress COVID-19 Pandemic?

Chen, Y.; Dong, M.

2020-06-03 public and global health
10.1101/2020.05.31.20117986 medRxiv
Show abstract

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), which can be transmitted via respiratory secretions. Since there are currently no specific therapeutics or vaccines available against the SARS-CoV-2, the commen non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) are still the main measures to curb the COVID-19 epidemic. Face mask wearing is one important measure to suppress the pandemic. In order to know how efficient is face mask wearing in reducing the pandemic even with low efficiency non-professional face masks, we exploit physical abstraction to model the non-professional face masks made from cotton woven fabrics and characterize them by a parameter virus penetration rate (VPR){gamma} . Monte Carlo simulations exhibit that the effective reproduction number R of COVID-19 or similar pandemics can be approximately reduced by factor{gamma} 4 with respect to the basic reproduction number R0, if the face masks with 70% < {gamma} < 90% are universally applied for the entire network. Furthermore, thought experiments and practical exploitation examples in country-level and city-level are enumerated and discussed to support our discovery in this study and indicate that the outbreak of a COVID-19 like pandemic can be even suppressed by the low efficiency non-professional face masks.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 8%
8.7%
2
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.1%
3
Frontiers in Physics
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 30%
5.0%
5
Nonlinear Dynamics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
6
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 19%
4.5%
7
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.1%
8
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
9
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.7%
10
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 11%
3.2%
50% of probability mass above
11
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.4%
12
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.2%
13
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
14
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
15
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
16
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
17
Physics of Fluids
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
18
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.4%
19
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.4%
20
Applied Sciences
24 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
21
Expert Systems with Applications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
22
Physical Review Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
23
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
24
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.0%
25
Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering
23 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
26
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
27
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
28
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
29
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
30
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 43%
0.8%