Back

Rethinking antiviral effects for COVID-19 in clinical studies: early initiation is key to successful treatment

Iwanami, S.; Ejima, K.; Kim, K. S.; Noshita, K.; Fujita, Y.; Miyazaki, T.; Kohno, S.; Miyazaki, Y.; Morimoto, S.; Nakaoka, S.; Koizumi, Y.; Asai, Y.; Aihara, K.; Watashi, K.; Thompson, R. N.; Shibuya, K.; Fujiu, K.; Perelson, A. S.; Shingo, I.; Wakita, T.

2020-06-03 infectious diseases
10.1101/2020.05.30.20118067 medRxiv
Show abstract

Development of an effective antiviral drug for COVID-19 is a global health priority. Although several candidate drugs have been identified through in vitro and in vivo models, consistent and compelling evidence for effective drugs from clinical studies is limited. The lack of evidence could be in part due to heterogeneity of virus dynamics among patients and late initiation of treatment. We first quantified the heterogeneity of viral dynamics which could be a confounder in compassionate use programs. Second, we demonstrated that an antiviral drug is unlikely to be effective if initiated after a short period following symptom onset. For accurate evaluation of the efficacy of an antiviral drug for COVID-19, antiviral treatment should be initiated before or soon after symptom onset in randomized clinical trials. One Sentence SummaryStudy design to evaluate antiviral effect.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.