EasyCOV : LAMP based rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2 in saliva
L'Helgouach, N.; Champigneux, P.; Santos-Schneider, F.; Molina, L.; Espeut, J.; Alali, M.; Baptiste, J.; Cardeur, L.; Dubuc, B.; Foulongne, V.; Galtier, F.; Makinson, A.; Marin, G.; Picot, M.-C.; Prieux-Lejeune, A.; Quenot, M.; Checa-Robles, F. J.; Salvetat, N.; Vetter, D.; Reynes, J.; Molina, F.
Show abstract
Covid-19 crisis showed us that rapid massive virus detection campaign is a key element in SARS-CoV-2 pandemic response. The classical RT-PCR laboratory platforms must be complemented with rapid and simplified technologies to enhance efficiency of large testing strategies. To this aim, we developed EasyCOV, a direct saliva RT-LAMP based SARS-CoV-2 virus detection assay that do not requires any RNA extraction step. It allows robust and rapid response under safe and easy conditions for healthcare workers and patients. EasyCOV test was assessed under double blind clinical conditions (93 asymptomatic healthcare worker volonteers, 10 actively infected patients, 20 former infected patients tested during late control visit). EasyCOV results were compared with classical laboratory RT-PCR performed on nasopharyngeal samples. Our results show that compared with nasopharyngeal laboratory RT-PCR, EasyCOV SARS-CoV-2 detection test has a sensitivity of 72.7%. Measured on healthcare worker population the specificity was 95.7%. LAMP technology on saliva is clearly able to identify subjects with infectivity profile. Among healthcare worker population EasyCOV test detected one presymptomatic subject. Because it is simple, rapid and painless for patients, EasyCOV saliva SARS-Cov-2 detection test may be useful for large screening of general population.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and Implementation of a Simple and Rapid Extraction-Free Saliva SARS-CoV-2 RT-LAMP Workflow for Workplace Surveillance 96%
- Evaluation of GENECUBE ® HQ SARS-CoV-2 for anterior nasal samples and saliva samples with a new rapid examination protocol 96%
- Validation of a Novel Molecular Assay to the Diagnostic of COVID-19 Based on Real Time PCR with High Resolution Melting 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation and modelling of the performance of an automated SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay according to sample type, target population and epidemic trends 96%
- SalivaSTAT: Direct-PCR and pooling of saliva samples collected in healthcare and community setting for SARS-CoV-2 mass surveillance 95%
- Reducing the Cost of Rapid Antigen Tests through Swab Pooling and Extraction in a Device 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Validation of a rapid, saliva-based, and ultra-sensitive SARS-CoV-2 screening system for a pandemic-scale infection surveillance 96%
- Performance evaluation of a non-invasive one-step multiplex RT-qPCR assay for detection of SARS-CoV-2 direct from human saliva 96%
- Evaluation of saliva molecular point of care for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in ambulatory care 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Real-life performance of a novel antigen detection test on nasopharyngeal specimens for SARS-CoV-2 infection diagnosis: a prospective study 95%
- Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Different Human Biofluids Using the Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification Assay: A Prospective Diagnostic Study in Fortaleza, Brazil 95%
- Evaluation the auxiliary diagnosis value of antibodies assays for detection of novel coronavirus (SARS-Cov-2) causing an outbreak of pneumonia (COVID-19) 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of nCoV-QS (MiCo BioMed) for RT-qPCR detection of SARS-CoV-2 from nasopharyngeal samples using CDC FDA EUA qPCR kit as a gold standard: an example of the need of validation studies. 94%
- Is the glass half full? Extraction-free RT-LAMP to detect SARS-CoV-2 is less sensitive but highly specific compared to standard RT-PCR in 101 samples 94%
- Evaluation of three rapid lateral flow antigen detection tests for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.