High Resolution CHEST CT(HRCT) Evaluation in Patients Hospitalized with COVID-19 Infection
Patel, M.; Chowdhury, J.; Zheng, M.; Abramian, O.; Verga, S.; Zhao, H.; Patlakh, N.; Fleece, D.; Cohen, G.; Kumaran, M.; Dass, C.; Criner, G.
Show abstract
IntroductionCurrently the main diagnostic modality for COVID-19 (Coronavirus disease-2019) is reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) via nasopharyngeal swab which has high false negative rates. We evaluated the performance of high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) imaging in the diagnosis of suspected COVID-19 infection compared to RT-PCR nasopharyngeal swab alone in patients hospitalized for suspected COVID-19 infection. MethodsThis was a retrospective analysis of 324 consecutive patients admitted to Temple University Hospital. All hospitalized patients who had RT-PCR testing and HRCT were included in the study. HRCTs were classified as Category 1, 2 or 3. Patients were then divided into four groups based on HRCT category and RT-PCR swab results for analysis. ResultsThe average age of patients was 59.4 ({+/-}15.2) years and 123 (38.9%) were female. Predominant ethnicity was African American 148 (46.11%). 161 patients tested positive by RT-PCR, while 41 tested positive by HRCT. 167 (52.02%) had category 1 scan, 63 (19.63%) had category 2 scan and 91 (28.35%) had category 3 HRCT scans. There was substantial agreement between our radiologists for HRCT classification ({kappa} = 0.64). Sensitivity and specificity of HRCT classification system was 77.6 and 73.7 respectively. Ferritin, LDH, AST and ALT were higher in Group 1 and D-dimers levels was higher in Group 3; differences however were not statistically significant. ConclusionDue to its high infectivity and asymptomatic transmission, until a highly sensitive and specific COVID-19 test is developed, HRCT should be incorporated into the assessment of patients who are hospitalized with suspected COVID-19. Key PointsO_ST_ABSKey QuestionC_ST_ABSCan High Resolution CT chest (HRCT) improve diagnostic accuracy of current Nasopharyngeal swab in suspected COVID-19 patients? Bottom LineIn this retrospective analysis, our novel HRCT classification identified 20% of all COVID-19 patients who had negative nasopharyngeal reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests but had HRCT findings consistent with COVID-19 pneumonia. These patients were ruled out for other infections and laboratory markers were similar to other RT-PCR positive patients Why Read onOur new HRCT classification when combined with RT-PCR can improve diagnostic accuracy while promptly improving triaging in COVID-19 patients.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Quantitative analysis of chest computed tomography of COVID-19 pneumonia using a software widely used in Japan 95%
- Accuracy of deep learning based computed tomography diagnostic system of COVID-19: a consecutive sampling external validation cohort study 94%
- Assessing the impact of the Gamma variant on COVID-19 Patient admissions in a Southern Brazilian tertiary hospital - A comparison of dual pandemic phases 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Point-of-care lung ultrasonography for early identification of mild COVID-19: a prospective cohort of outpatients in a Swiss screening center 95%
- Epidemiological And Clinical Characteristics Of COVID-19 Patients In Kenya 94%
- Chest X-Ray Has Poor Diagnostic Accuracy and Prognostic Significance in COVID-19: A Propensity Matched Database Study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Head-to head comparison of anterior nares and nasopharyngeal swabs for SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection in a community drive-through test centre in the UK 91%
- Prevalence and predictors of latent tuberculosis infection among people living with HIV in a high tuberculosis burden context 90%
- Clinical characteristics and outcomes of adult patients admitted with COVID-19 in East London: a retrospective cohort analysis 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Chest CT Features of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China: A Meta-analysis of 19 Trials 92%
- Multicenter performance evaluation of a novel rapid molecular point-of-care test to detect influenza using nasopharyngeal swabs and gargle samples 91%
- Reverse-transcription recombinase-aided amplification assay for H5 subtype avian influenza virus 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Post mortem pathological findings in COVID-19 cases: A Systematic Review 93%
- Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Laboratory-Confirmed SARS-CoV-2 Cases Infected with Omicron subvariants and XBB recombinant variant 92%
- Clinical diagnosis of COVID-19: a prompt, feasible, and sensitive diagnostic tool for COVID-19 based on a 1,757-patient cohort (The AndroCoV Clinical Scoring for COVID-19 diagnosis) 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.