Back

Multi-metrics assessment of dynamic cerebral autoregulation in middle and posterior cerebral arteries in young fit women

Labrecque, L.; Drapeau, A.; Rahimaly, K.; Imhoff, S.; Billaut, F.; Brassard, P.

2020-05-27 physiology
10.1101/2020.05.25.114447 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Individuals with low orthostatic tolerance show greater decrease in posterior cerebral artery mean blood velocity (PCAvmean). Since young fit women often experience presyncopal symptoms, their posterior cerebral circulation may be prone to greater decreases in PCAvmean, probably explained by an attenuated dynamic cerebral autoregulation (dCA). Regional differences in dCA have never been evaluated in young fit women. We compared dCA in the middle cerebral artery (MCA) and posterior cerebral artery (PCA) in 11 young fit women (25 {+/-} 4y; [Formula]) in response to a sit-to-stand (5 min sitting followed by 5 min standing) and repeated squat-stand maneuvers performed at 0.05 Hz and 0.10 Hz. The cerebral pressure-flow relationship was characterized using four metrics: 1) percent reduction in blood velocity (BV) per percent reduction in MAP (% BV/% MAP) during initial orthostatic stress (0-15 s after sit-to-stand); 2) onset of the regulatory response (i.e. time delay before an increase in conductance (BV/MAP); 3) rate of regulation (RoR), following sit-to-stand and; 4) transfer function analysis (TFA) of forced MAP oscillations induced by repeated squat-stands. Upon standing, the relative decline in MCAvmean and PCAvmean was similar (-25 {+/-} 9 vs. -30 {+/-} 13%; p=0.29). The onset of the regulatory response (p=0.665), %{Delta}BV/%{Delta}MAP (p=0.129) and RoR (p=0.067) were not different between MCA and PCA. In regard to TFA, there was an ANOVA artery effect for gain (p<0.001) and a frequency effect for phase (p<0.001). These findings indicate the absence of regional differences in dCA in young fit women. New findingsO_ST_ABSWhat is the central question of this study?C_ST_ABSAre there regional differences in the dynamic cerebral autoregulation in young fit women? What is the main finding and its importance?The key finding of this study is that there are no differences in dynamic cerebral autoregulation between both arteries. These results indicate that dynamic cerebral autoregulation does not seem to be responsible for making the posterior cerebral circulation more vulnerable to transient reduction in blood pressure in young fit women.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Applied Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.0%
2
Physiological Reports
40 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.7%
3
Frontiers in Physiology
106 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.5%
50% of probability mass above
4
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 27%
5.6%
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 18%
5.3%
6
The Journal of Physiology
150 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.4%
7
Experimental Physiology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
8
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.3%
9
Physiological Measurement
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
10
American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
11
European Journal of Applied Physiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
12
Journal of the American Heart Association
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
13
Experimental Brain Research
53 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
14
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.2%
15
Frontiers in Neurology
102 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
16
Journal of Experimental Biology
259 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
17
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
18
GeroScience
109 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
19
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
20
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
21
Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
42 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
22
Psychophysiology
77 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
23
Journal of Biomechanics
64 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%