A Study of Secondary School Students Participation in a Novel Course on Genomic Principles and Practices.
Stefanile, A.
Show abstract
This paper presents the design, development, and validation of a study among secondary school students’ participation in a novel course on genomic principles and practices by analyzing and documenting evidence of their participation, and educational outcomes, in a novel course on genomic principles and practices. A mixed methods approach, using qualitative and quantitative methods, was used to address three research questions. 1) Based on affective evidence, how did secondary school students perceive and critically judge, content topics learned in a course on modern genomic principles and practices? 2) Based on cognitive evidence, how much of the content did secondary school students learn when they participated in a course on modern genomic principles and practices? 3) Using individual interview evidence, what are the major perceptions that the secondary school students expressed throughout the duration of the course? The participants were provided an opportunity to comment on the course through individual and collaborative interviews, in order to find out to what extent they perceived the course to be interesting and challenging. Future inquiry expanding from this research would help to establish the foundational pathway for designing a more inclusive genomics curriculum. In conclusion, the course offered real-life/real-world applications that encourage all students to conceptualize genomics, human health, diseases, medicine, ethics, beliefs, research, and careers.View Full Text
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Flying in the Face of Adversity: A Drosophila-based Virtual CURE Provides Semester-long Authentic Research Opportunity to the Flipped Classroom. 95%
- Preprint peer review enhances undergraduate biology students' disciplinary literacy and sense of belonging in STEM 95%
- Building the lac operon: A guided-inquiry activity using 3D printed models 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Insights into the Datasets, Tools, and Training Needs of the AnVIL Community: 2024 92%
- SNPector: SNP inspection tool for diagnosing gene pathogenicity and drug response in a naked sequence 89%
- Child health, nutrition and gut microbiota development during the first two years of life; study protocol of a prospective cohort study from the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- A structured reflective process supports student awareness of employability skills development in a science placement module 95%
- A framework for decolonising and diversifying biomedical sciences curricula: rediscovery, representation and readiness 93%
- CRISPR-based knockin mutagenesis of the pioneer transcription factor FOXA1; optimization of strategies for multi-allelic proteins in cancer cells 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cloud-controlled microscopy enables remote project-based biology education in Latinx communities in the United States and Latin America 96%
- Perceptions of Complementary, Alternative, and Integrative Medicine: Insights from a Large-Scale International Cross-Sectional Survey of Surgery Researchers and Clinicians 90%
- Self-learning on COVID-19 among medical students and their preparedness to participate in government's COVID-19 response in Bhutan: a cross-sectional study 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.