Back

Investigational treatments for COVID-19 may increase ventricular arrhythmia risk through drug interactions

Varshneya, M.; Irurzun-Arana, I.; Campana, C.; Dariolli, R.; Gutierrez, A.; Pullinger, T. K.; Sobie, E. A.

2020-05-26 pharmacology and therapeutics
10.1101/2020.05.21.20109397
Show abstract

Many drugs that have been proposed for treatment of COVID-19 are reported to cause cardiac adverse events, including ventricular arrhythmias. In order to properly weigh risks against potential benefits, particularly when decisions must be made quickly, mathematical modeling of both drug disposition and drug action can be useful for predicting patient response and making informed decisions. Here we explored the potential effects on cardiac electrophysiology of 4 drugs proposed to treat COVID-19: lopinavir, ritonavir, chloroquine, and azithromycin, as well as combination therapy involving these drugs. Our study combined simulations of pharmacokinetics (PK) with quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) modeling of ventricular myocytes to predict potential cardiac adverse events caused by these treatments. Simulation results predicted that drug combinations can lead to greater cellular action potential prolongation, analogous to QT prolongation, compared with drugs given in isolation. The combination effect can result from both pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic drug interactions. Importantly, simulations of different patient groups predicted that females with pre-existing heart disease are especially susceptible to drug-induced arrhythmias, compared males with disease or healthy individuals of either sex. Overall, the results illustrate how PK and QSP modeling may be combined to more precisely predict cardiac risks of COVID-19 therapies.

Matching journals

1
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Wiley · based on 19 published papers
#1
248× avg
2
Scientific Reports
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 701 published papers
Top 7%
2.7× avg
3
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Wiley · based on 21 published papers
Top 0.2%
86× avg
4
Frontiers in Pharmacology
Frontiers Media SA · based on 27 published papers
Top 0.4%
37× avg
5
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
American Society for Microbiology · based on 17 published papers
Top 0.1%
80× avg
6
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 67%
5.3%
7
Clinical and Translational Science
Wiley · based on 14 published papers
Top 0.1%
53× avg
8
eLife
eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd · based on 262 published papers
Top 11%
2.4× avg
9
JMIRx Med
JMIR Publications Inc. · based on 29 published papers
Top 4%
6.3× avg
10
Frontiers in Medicine
Frontiers Media SA · based on 99 published papers
Top 17%
0.8%
11
Emerging Microbes & Infections
Informa UK Limited · based on 20 published papers
Top 2%
9.2× avg
12
PLOS Digital Health
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 88 published papers
Top 13%
0.7%
13
PLOS Biology
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 14 published papers
Top 0.3%
18× avg
14
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
Wiley · based on 14 published papers
Top 2%
8.7× avg
15
Nature Medicine
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 88 published papers
Top 18%
0.7%
16
Nature Communications
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 483 published papers
Top 43%
0.7%
17
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
Elsevier BV · based on 14 published papers
Top 2%
9.0× avg
18
Emerging Infectious Diseases
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) · based on 84 published papers
Top 12%
1.7× avg
19
F1000Research
F1000 Research Ltd · based on 28 published papers
Top 6%
3.8× avg
20
Heart Rhythm
Elsevier BV · based on 16 published papers
Top 3%
4.5× avg