Hydroxychloroquine in COVID-19: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
Chacko, J.; Brar, G.; Premkumar, R.
Show abstract
BackgroundHydroxychloroquine is being administered among patients with COVID-19 infection in many healthcare systems across the world, considering its in vitro effect against the SARS-CoV-2 virus. In spite of several observational studies and a few randomized controlled trials, the effect of hydroxychloroquine on patients with COVID-19 infection remains unclear. We undertook this systematic review with meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of hydroxychloroquine among patients with COVID-19 infection. MethodsWe searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, medRxiv, and other relevant resources until August 1, 2020. We included randomized controlled trials and observational studies in which hydroxychloroquine was administered and compared to a control group. Data were extracted, and quality assessment of the studies was carried out. We evaluated symptomatic progression, mortality, viral clearance, evolution of changes on chest CT imaging, and adverse events. A fixed or random-effects model was used depending on outcome heterogeneity. ResultsWe included 23 studies, including seven randomized controlled trials and 16 observational studies. Among these, 11,029 patients received hydroxychloroquine alone or in combination, while 12063 did not. Mortality was reported at different points in time. The overall mortality was not significantly different among patients who received hydroxychloroquine compared to the control group (OR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.72-1.22; p = 0.63). Clinical worsening did not differ between patients who received hydroxychloroquine compared to those who did not (OR 0.93, 95% CI: 0.57-1.52; p = 0.77). Negative conversion, assessed by RT-PCR, did not differ significantly between the hydroxychloroquine and the control groups (OR: 0.67, CI: 0.21-2.11; p = 0.49). The evolution of changes on chest CT imaging was reported only in two studies; a more pronounced improvement was observed with the use of hydroxychloroquine compared to standard care (OR: 2.68, CI: 1.1-6.55; P = 0.03). The incidence of adverse events was significantly higher with hydroxychloroquine (OR: 5.95, CI: 2.56-13.83; p < 0.00001). ConclusionsOur meta-analysis does not suggest improvement in mortality, clinical progression, or negative conversion by RT-PCR among patients with COVID-19 infection who are treated with hydroxychloroquine. There was a significantly higher incidence of adverse events with hydroxychloroquine use.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Hydroxychloroquine in the treatment of outpatients with mildly symptomatic COVID-19: A multi-center observational study 93%
- Janus Kinase-Inhibitor and Type I Interferon Ability to Produce Favorable Clinical Outcomes in COVID-19 Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 92%
- The tryptophan catabolite or kynurenine pathway in COVID-19 and critical COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Hydroxychloroquine and Tocilizumab Therapy in COVID-19 Patients - An Observational Study 95%
- Protocol for the systematic review of the Pneumocystis jirovecii -associated pneumonia in non-HIV immunocompromised patients 94%
- A Multicenter, randomized, open-label, controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of hydroxychloroquine and a retrospective study in adult patients with mild to moderate Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Hydroxychloroquine and mortality risk of patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis of human comparative studies 96%
- A placebo-controlled double blind trial of hydroxychloroquine in mild-to-moderate COVID-19 94%
- An open-label randomized, controlled trial of the effect of lopinavir/ritonavir, lopinavir/ritonavir plus IFN-β-1a and hydroxychloroquine in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 – Final results from the DisCoVeRy trial 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Safety of Hydroxychloroquine among Outpatient Clinical Trial Participants for COVID-19 93%
- Cost-effectiveness of remdesivir and dexamethasone for COVID-19 treatment in South Africa 92%
- Adverse Events Among People Living with HIV Receiving Dolutegravir Based Regimens: Findings from a Six Month Active Pharmacovigilance Study in Uganda 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessment of Hydroxychloroquine and Chloroquine Safety Profiles: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 95%
- Echinacea purpurea for the Long-term Prevention of Viral Respiratory Tract Infections during COVID-19 Pandemic: A Randomized, Open, Controlled, Exploratory Clinical Study 93%
- Favipiravir versus Arbidol for COVID-19: A Randomized Clinical Trial 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.