Ventilatory Support In SARS-Voc-2 During Intensive Therapy
Pereira Rodriguez, J. E.; Quintero Gomez, J. C.; Lopez Florez, O.; Waiss Skvirsky, S. S.; Velasquez Badillo, X.
Show abstract
IntroductionThe SARS-CoV-2 disease outbreak has now become a pandemic. Critical patients with COVID-19 require basic and advanced respiratory support. Therefore, the objective was to describe the ventilatory support strategies in SARS-CoV-2 during intensive therapy. Materials and methodsA systematic review of observational studies of the available scientific literature was performed in accordance with the recommendations of the Cochrane collaboration and the criteria of the PRISMA Declaration. ResultsFifteen observational studies were included that gave a study population of 4,081 patients. Mechanical ventilation is the main respiratory support treatment for critically ill patients, which should be administered as soon as normal oxygenation cannot be maintained, and despite the fact that there is no current consensus on the parameters of mechanical ventilation, the evidence collected suggests the use of Fio2 on average 50%, PEEP of 14 cmH2O, lung compliance of 29-37 ml per cm of water, driving pressure between 12-14 cm of water and a plateau pressure of 22-25 cm of water. ConclusionsIL-6 is shown as a possible marker of respiratory failure and a worse prognosis as well as obesity. In addition, the use of prone position, neuromuscular blockade, pulmonary vasodilators, ECMO, and mechanical ventilation based on the clinical conditions and needs of the patient with COVID-19 are strategies that could benefit patients entering intensive therapy for SARS-CoV-2.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Observational study of changes in utilization and outcomes in non-invasive ventilation in COVID-19 95%
- Admission criteria in critically ill COVID-19 patients: a physiology-based approach 95%
- COVID-19 ICU and mechanical ventilation patient characteristics and outcomes - A systematic review and meta-analysis 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Efficacy of remdesivir-containing therapy in hospitalized COVID-19 patients: a prospective clinical experience 93%
- Evaluating the Association and Predictability of Complex Medication Regimen Scores with Clinical Outcomes Among the Critically Ill 93%
- Administration of tocilizumab to patients with high concentrations of IL-6 in the course of COVID-19 is associated with a better prognosis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Helmet noninvasive ventilation for COVID-19 patients (Helmet-COVID): study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial 93%
- The Diagnostic Accuracy of Subjective Dyspnea in Detecting Hypoxemia Among Outpatients with COVID-19 93%
- Identification of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome subphenotypes denovo using routine clinical data: a retrospective analysis of ARDS clinical trials 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Muscle Strength and Muscle Mass as Predictors of Hospital Length of Stay in Patients with Moderate to Severe COVID-19: A Prospective Observational Study 91%
- Myonuclear apoptosis underlies diaphragm atrophy in mechanically ventilated ICU patients. 90%
- Severity Of Lung Obstruction And Older Age, But Not Physical Activity, Predict Locomotor Muscle Oxidative Impairment In COPD 89%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.