Back

Empirical Model of Spring 2020 Decrease in Daily Confirmed COVID-19 Cases in King County, Washington

Roach, J. C.

2020-06-18 epidemiology
10.1101/2020.05.11.20098798 medRxiv
Show abstract

Projections of the near future of daily case incidence of COVID-19 are valuable for informing public policy. Near-future estimates are also useful for outbreaks of other diseases. Short-term predictions are unlikely to be affected by changes in herd immunity. In the absence of major net changes in factors that affect reproduction number (R), the two-parameter exponential model should be a standard model - indeed, it has been standard for epidemiological analysis of pandemics for a century but in recent decades has lost popularity to more complex compartmental models. Exponential models should be routinely included in reports describing epidemiological models as a reference, or null hypothesis. Exponential models should be fitted separately for each epidemiologically distinct jurisdiction. They should also be fitted separately to time intervals that differ by any major changes in factors that affect R. Using an exponential model, incidence-count half-life (t1/2) is a better statistic than R. Here an example of the exponential model is applied to King County, Washington during Spring 2020. During the pandemic, the parameters and predictions of this model have remained stable for intervals of one to four months, and the accuracy of model predictions has outperformed models with more parameters. The COVID pandemic can be modeled as a series of exponential curves, each spanning an interval ranging from one to four months. The length of these intervals is hard to predict, other than to extrapolate that future intervals will last about as long as past intervals.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Infectious Disease Modelling
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.8%
2
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.6%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 18%
10.2%
4
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.9%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 30%
4.0%
7
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 9%
3.6%
8
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.6%
9
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.9%
10
Mathematical Biosciences
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
11
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
12
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
13
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
14
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
15
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.2%
16
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
17
Medical Decision Making
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
18
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
19
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 57%
0.8%
20
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
21
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
22
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
24
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
25
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
26
Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
27
BMC Medical Education
20 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
28
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
29
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
32 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
30
Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering
23 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%