Back

Systemic hypoferraemia and severity of hypoxaemic respiratory failure in COVID-19

Shah, A.; Frost, J.; Aaron, L.; Donovan, K.; McKechnie, S.; Stanworth, S.; Drakesmith, H.

2020-05-13 intensive care and critical care medicine
10.1101/2020.05.11.20092114
Show abstract

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) mortality is associated with hypoxaemia, multiorgan failure, and thromboinflammation. However severity of disease varies considerably and understanding physiological changes that may link to poor outcomes is important. Although increased serum ferritin has been observed in COVID-19 patients consistent with inflammation, other iron parameters have not been examined to our knowledge. Because iron is required for immunity and oxygen utilisation, and dysregulated iron homeostasis has been observed in COPD, we investigated serum iron concentrations in 30 patients with COVID-19 requiring ICU admission. All patients had low serum iron but patients with severe hypoxemic respiratory failure had more profound hypoferraemia. The area under the curve for receiver operating characteristic curves for serum iron to identify severe hypoxemia was 0{middle dot}95; the optimal Youden Index for distinguishing between severe and non-severe hypoxemia was a serum iron concentration of 2{middle dot}9 mol/L. By linear regression, serum iron was associated with lymphocyte count and PaO2/FiO2. In conclusion, profound hypoferraemia identifies COVID-19 patients with severe hypoxaemia. Serum iron is a simple biomarker that could be usefully employed to stratify patients and monitor disease. Severe hypoferraemia may plausibly impair critical iron-dependent processes such as lymphocyte responses and hypoxia sensing, contributing to pathology, and is potentially treatable.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Critical Care
based on 14 papers
Top 0.1%
13.5%
2
European Respiratory Journal
based on 44 papers
Top 0.5%
11.4%
3
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
based on 23 papers
Top 0.1%
11.4%
4
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 57%
7.7%
5
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 22%
7.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
Critical Care Explorations
based on 15 papers
Top 0.5%
4.6%
7
JCI Insight
based on 63 papers
Top 2%
2.9%
8
Journal of Internal Medicine
based on 12 papers
Top 0.1%
2.9%
9
eBioMedicine
based on 82 papers
Top 0.6%
2.9%
10
ERJ Open Research
based on 36 papers
Top 1%
2.5%
11
The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
based on 16 papers
Top 0.2%
2.5%
12
eLife
based on 262 papers
Top 13%
2.4%
13
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
based on 137 papers
Top 5%
1.8%
14
Frontiers in Medicine
based on 99 papers
Top 10%
1.8%
15
iScience
based on 74 papers
Top 4%
1.3%
16
Science Translational Medicine
based on 40 papers
Top 3%
1.3%
17
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 34%
1.3%
18
Aging
based on 18 papers
Top 3%
1.2%
19
Biomedicines
based on 21 papers
Top 3%
0.8%
20
Frontiers in Immunology
based on 140 papers
Top 7%
0.8%
21
EBioMedicine
based on 21 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
22
Thorax
based on 29 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
based on 22 papers
Top 5%
0.7%
24
Clinical Immunology
based on 12 papers
Top 2%
0.7%
25
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
based on 32 papers
Top 3%
0.7%