Back

Effect of Alert Level 4 on effective reproduction number: review of international COVID-19 cases

Binny, R. N.; Hendy, S. C.; James, A.; Lustig, A.; Plank, M. J.; Steyn, N.

2020-05-06 epidemiology
10.1101/2020.04.30.20086934 medRxiv
Show abstract

The effective reproduction number, Reff, is an important measure of transmission potential in the modelling of epidemics. It measures the average number of people that will be infected by a single contagious individual. A value of Reff > 1 suggests that an outbreak will occur, while Reff < 1 suggests the virus will die out. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, countries worldwide are implementing a range of intervention measures, such as population-wide social distancing and case isolation, with the goal of reducing Reff to values below one, to slow or eliminate transmission. We analyse case data from 25 international locations to estimate their Reff values over time and to assess the effectiveness of interventions, equivalent to New Zealands Alert Levels 1-4, for reducing transmission. Our results show that strong interventions, equivalent to NZs Alert Level 3 or 4, have been successful at reducing Reff below the threshold for outbreak. In general, countries that implemented strong interventions earlier in their outbreak have managed to maintain case numbers at lower levels. These estimates provide indicative ranges of Reff for each Alert Level, to inform parameters in models of COVID-19 spread under different intervention scenarios in New Zealand and worldwide. Predictions from such models are important for informing policy and decisions on intervention timing and stringency during the pandemic. Executive SummaryO_LIIn response to the COVID-19 pandemic, countries around the world are implementing a range of intervention measures, such as population-wide social distancing and case isolation, with the goal of reducing the spread of the virus. C_LIO_LIReff, the effective reproduction number, measures the average number of people that will be infected by a single contagious individual. A value of Reff > 1 suggests that an outbreak will occur, while Reff < 1 suggests the virus will die out. C_LIO_LIComparing Reff in an early outbreak phase (no or low-level interventions implemented) with a later phase (moderate to high interventions) indicates how effective these measures are for reducing Reff. C_LIO_LIWe estimate early-phase and late-phase Reff values for COVID-19 outbreaks in 25 countries (or provinces/states). Results suggest interventions equivalent to NZs Alert Level 3-4 can successfully reduce Reff below the threshold for outbreak. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Infectious Disease Modelling
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.7%
2
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.6%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 24%
7.2%
4
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 5%
6.7%
5
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.1%
50% of probability mass above
6
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.1%
7
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
5.1%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 29%
4.2%
9
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
10
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.8%
11
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
12
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
13
Mathematical Biosciences
42 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
14
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.0%
15
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
16
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
17
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
18
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
19
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 57%
0.8%
20
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
21
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
22
Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
23
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
24
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
25
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%
26
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%