Prognostic significance of compound combined peri-operative biomarkers in gastric cancer
Powell, A. G.; Coxon, A. H.; Robinson, D.; James, O.; Christian, A.; Roberts, S. A.; Lewis, W. G.
Show abstract
BackgroundSurvival after gastric cancer surgery is largely attributed to tumor biology, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), and surgical approach, yet other prognostic factors have been reported, including pre-operative systemic inflammatory response (SIR), and Morbidity Severity Score (MSS). The hypothesis tested was that a SIR, MMS, and pathological composite score, would be associated with disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS). MethodsConsecutive 358 patients undergoing potentially curative gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma were studied. Complications were defined as a MSS of Clavien-Dindo classification (CDSC) >1. Serum SIR measurements were performed on the day before surgery, and a composite score (CIMpN) (0-3) was developed based on CRP, morbidity, and pN-stage. Primary outcome measures were DFS and OS. ResultsPost-operative complications occurred in 138 (38.5%) patients, (8 (2.2%) deaths), and was associated with higher CRP (28.3% vs. 15.5%, p=0.003), vascular invasion (55.8% vs. 36.8%, p<0.001), and R1 status (26.1% vs. 9.5%, p=0.001). Five-year DFS and OS were 32.9% and 33.3% for patients with post-operative complications compared with 62.5% and 64.0% in controls (p<0.001). Five-year DFS and OS were 31.4% and 37.3% in patients with raised CRPs compared with 58.5% and 59.5% in controls (p=0.005, p=0.001, respectively). Five-year DFS for CIMpN scores of 0, 1, 2, and 3 were 85.9%, 50.0%, 26.2%, and 15.4% (p<0.001) respectively. On multivariable analysis CIMpN score was independently associated with DFS [HR 3.00, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.90-4.73, p<0.001] and OS [1.93 (1.43-2.59), p<0.001]. ConclusionA novel composite score, CIMpN, based on SIR, MSS and pN-stage, offers important prognostic signals.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Survival benefit of adjuvant therapy following neoadjuvant therapy in patients with resected esophageal cancer: a retrospective cohort study 95%
- Machine learning based prediction of recurrence after curative resection for rectal cancer 93%
- Exploring Hypoxia-Related Genes as Prognostic Indicators in Lung Adenocarcinoma 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Immune Landscape of Invasive Ductal Carcinoma Tumour Microenvironment Identifies a Prognostic and Immunotherapeutically Relevant Gene Signature 93%
- Factors affecting COVID-19 outcomes in cancer patients - A first report from Guys Cancer Centre in London 92%
- Hepatic resection versus transarterial chemoembolization for the intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma: A cohort study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A novel molecular analysis approach in colorectal cancer suggests new treatment opportunities 94%
- Use of high-plex data reveals novel insights into the tumour microenvironment of clear cell renal cell carcinoma 94%
- Molecular Heterogeneity in Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer: Pathway-Specific Insights in High-Risk Populations 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Molecular subtyping improves prognostication of Stage 2 colorectal cancer 94%
- Translational control of Bcl-2 promotes apoptosis of gastric carcinoma cells 93%
- The Concept of Stroma AReactive Invasion Front Areas (SARIFA) as a New Prognostic Biomarker for Lipid-driven Cancers Holds True in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Pan-cancer analyses of the associations between 109 pre-existing conditions and cancer treatment patterns across 19 adult cancers 93%
- Immune Classification of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma 92%
- Deeper insights into long-term survival heterogeneity of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients using integrative individual- and group-level transcriptome network analyses 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.