A low-cost multi-patient pressure-controlled ventilation system with individualized parameter settings.
Jardim-Neto, A. C.; Perlman, C. E.
Show abstract
In a major health crisis, demand for mechanical ventilators may exceed supply. This scenario has led to the idea of connecting ventilation circuits in parallel to ventilate multiple patients simultaneously with the same machine. However, simple parallel connection may be harmful when the patients respiratory system mechanics differ. The aim of this work was to develop and test a low-cost, multi-patient, pressure-controlled ventilation system in which parameter settings could be individualized. Two types of circuits were built from polyvinyl chloride plumbing tubes and connectors, with ball valves and water columns used to control pressures. The circuits were connected to test lungs of differing compliances, ventilated in parallel at 20 cycles per minute and assessed for control error, variability and interdependency during peak inspiratory (20 to 35 cmH2O, in 5 cmH2O steps) and positive end-expiratory (5 to 20 to 5 cmH2O, in 5 cmH2O steps) pressure changes in one of the circuits. Results showed control errors lower than 1 cmH2O, a maximum standard deviation in pressure of 1.4 cmH2O and no dependency between the parallel circuits during the pressure maneuvers or a controlled disconnection/reconnection. This pressure-control system might be used to expand a commercial ventilator or, with constant gas inflow and an automated outlet valve, as a stand-alone ventilator with individually-controlled settings for multiple patients. In conclusion, the proposed solution is presented as a potentially reliable strategy for safely individualizing pressure-control parameters in a multi-patient ventilation system during a major health crisis.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Sharing ventilators in the Covid-19 pandemics. A bench study 95%
- PVP1–The People’s Ventilator Project: A fully open, low-cost, pressure-controlled ventilator 94%
- Computational simulation to assess patient safety of uncompensated COVID-19 two-patient ventilator sharing using the Pulse Physiology Engine 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Simple ventilators for emergency use based on Bag-Valve pressing systems: Lessons learned and future steps 97%
- Evaluation of Machine Learning predictions of a highly resolved long time series of Chlorophyll-a concentration 89%
- An efficient UV-C disinfection approach and biological assessment strategy for microphones 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Performance of EasyBreath ® Decathlon Snorkeling mask for Delivering Continuous Positive Airway Pressure 95%
- A Cross-sectional Feasibility Study to Evaluate the Usability and Efficacy of “Swaasa”: An AI-Platform for Rapid Respiratory Health Assessment 94%
- Computational Fluid Dynamics Modeling of Cough Transport in an Aircraft Cabin 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Eulerian-Lagrangian and thin film modeling of drug delivery under physiologically varying breathing in a realistic lung model 93%
- Evaluation of High Flow Local Extraction on control of the aerosol plume in an operating theatre 92%
- Airborne Transmission of COVID-19 and Mitigation Using Box Fan Air Cleaners in a Poorly Ventilated Classroom 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.