Development and validation of an early warning score (EWAS) for predicting clinical deterioration in patients with coronavirus disease 2019
Guo, Y.; Liu, Y.; Lu, J.; Fan, R.; Zhang, F.; Yin, X.; Liu, Z.; Zeng, Q.; Yuan, J.; Hu, S.; Wang, Q.; Liao, B.; Huang, M.; Yin, S.; Zhang, X.; Xin, R.; Lin, Z.; Hu, C.; Zhao, B.; He, R.; Liang, M.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, L.; Sun, J.; Tang, L.; Deng, L.; Xia, J.; Tang, X.; Liu, L.; Hou, J.
Show abstract
BackgroundSince the pandemic outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), the health system capacity in highly endemic areas has been overwhelmed. Approaches to efficient management are urgently needed. We aimed to develop and validate a score for early prediction of clinical deterioration of COVID-19 patients. MethodsIn this retrospective multicenter cohort study, we included 1138 mild to moderate COVID-19 patients admitted to 33 hospitals in Guangdong Province from December 27, 2019 to March 4, 2020 (N =818; training cohort), as well as two hospitals in Hubei Province from January 21 to February 22, 2020 (N =320; validation cohort) in the analysis. ResultsThe 14-day cumulative incidences of clinical deterioration were 7.9% and 12.1% in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. An Early WArning Score (EWAS) (ranging from 0 to 4.5), comprising of age, underlying chronic disease, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, C-reactive protein, and D-dimer levels, was developed (AUROC: 0.857). By applying the EWAS, patients were categorized into low-, medium-, and high risk groups (cut-off values: two and three). The 14-day cumulative incidence of clinical deterioration in the low-risk group was 1.8%, which was significantly lower than the incidence rates in the medium-(14.4%) and high-risk (40.9%) groups (P <.001). The predictability of EWAS was similar in the validation cohort (AUROC =0.781), patients in the low-, medium-, and high-risk groups had 14-day cumulative incidences of 2.6%, 10.0%, and 25.7%, respectively (P <.001). ConclusionThe EWAS, which is based on five common parameters, can predict COVID-19-related clinical deterioration and may be a useful tool for a rapid triage and establishing a COVID-19 hierarchical management system that will greatly focus clinical management and medical resources to reduce mortality in highly endemic areas.
Matching journals
The top 12 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Survival analysis of hospital length of stay of novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pneumonia patients in Sichuan, China 96%
- Clinical Laboratory Parameters Associated with Severe or Critical Novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis 94%
- Factors Associated with Disease Severity and Mortality among Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Novel Triage Tool of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Diagnosis Aid System for Suspected COVID-19 Pneumonia in Fever Clinics 95%
- A follow-up study of children infected with SARS-CoV-2 from Western China 92%
- Application of Telemedicine During the Coronavirus Disease Epidemics: A Rapid Review and Meta-Analysis 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comprehensive genomic, immunological and clinical analysis of COVID-19 vaccine breakthrough infections: a prospective, comparative cohort study 94%
- Transmission and clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in 104 outside-Wuhan patients, China 93%
- Early Clinical Factors Predicting the Development of Critical Disease in Japanese Patients with COVID-19: A Single-Center Retrospective, Observational Study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.