Back

Machine learning to predict 5-year survival among pediatric Acute Myeloid Leukemia patients and development of OSPAM-C online survival prediction tool

DAS, A.; Mishra, S.; Mishra, D. K.; Saraswathy Gopalan, S.

2020-08-25 health informatics
10.1101/2020.04.16.20068221 medRxiv
Show abstract

AbstractO_ST_ABSBackgroundC_ST_ABSAcute myeloid leukemia (AML) accounts for a fifth of childhood leukemia. Although survival rates for AML have greatly improved over the past few decades, they vary depending on demographic and AML type factors. ObjectivesTo predict the five-year survival among pediatric AML patients using machine learning algorithms and deploy the best performing algorithm as an online survival prediction tool. Materials and methodsPediatric patients (0 to 14 years) with a microscopically confirmed AML were extracted from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database (2000-2011) and randomly split into training and test datasets (80/20 ratio). Four machine learning algorithms (logistic regression, support vector machine, gradient boosting, and K nearest neighbor) were trained on features to predict five-year survival. Performances of the algorithms were compared, and the best performing algorithm was deployed as an online prediction tool. ResultsA total of 1,477 patients met our inclusion criteria. The gradient boosting algorithm was the best performer in terms of discrimination and predictive ability. It was deployed as the online survival prediction tool named OSPAM-C (https://ashis-das.shinyapps.io/ospam/). ConclusionsOur study provides a framework for the development and deployment of an online survival prediction tool for pediatric patients with AML. While external validation is needed, our survival prediction tool presents an opportunity to reach informed clinical decision-making for AML patients.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.7%
2
International Journal of Medical Informatics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.5%
4
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.5%
5
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.4%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 26%
4.4%
7
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.3%
50% of probability mass above
8
BioMed Research International
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.1%
9
BMC Medical Research Methodology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.1%
10
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.9%
11
Life
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
12
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
13
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
14
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.3%
15
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
16
Journal of Personalized Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
17
JMIR Medical Informatics
17 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
18
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
19
Blood Advances
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
20
Cancer Letters
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
21
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
22
Oncogenesis
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
23
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
24
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
25
Molecular Biology Reports
19 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
26
British Journal of Haematology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
27
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
12 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
28
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
29
Transplantation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
30
Modern Pathology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%