Back

Microbiome evaluation revealed salivary dysbiosis in addicts of betel nut preparations

Saleem, F.; Mujtaba, G.; Kori, J.; Hasan, A.; Azim, M. K.

2020-04-17 dentistry and oral medicine
10.1101/2020.04.13.20064063
Show abstract

Betel nut addiction is recognized as the causative agent of oral microbiome dysbiosis and other systematic disorders. A number of betel nut preparations containing ingredients such as slaked lime, catechu extract and tobacco are being commonly used particularly in South Asia. The underlying variations in the oral microbiome due to usage of betel nut preparations are poorly understood. We evaluated salivary microbiome in response to chewing of betel nut preparation(s). In order to assess the microbiome dynamics, metagenomic analysis of 16S rRNA gene (V3-V4 hypervariable region) from salivary bacteria in chewers of betel nut preparation (n = 16) and non-chewers (n = 55) was carried out by Greengenes and SILVA ribosomal sequence databases. It was observed that Gutka chewers demonstrated lower alpha diversity and number of bacterial genera than the non-chewers. Taxonomic assignment on phylum level revealed Firmicutes (p-value = 0.042 at 95% confidence interval) to be significantly more abundant in Gutka chewers in comparison with non-chewers. Beta diversity analysis at genus level by weighted unifrac distance matrices unveiled both groups to be divergent from each other. On the genus level, Veillonella (p-value = 0.015), Streptococcus (p-value = 0.026), Leptotrichia (p-value = 0.022) and Serratia (p-value = 0.022) species appeared to be significantly more abundant in Gutka chewers in comparison to non-chewers. The present study suggests salivary dysbiosis in response to gutka chewing and concludes that gutka chewers possess higher abundance of acidogenic and aciduric bacteria. This study contributes additional information regarding oral microbiome variations with response to gutka consumption.

Matching journals

1
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 10 published papers
#1
186× avg
2
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 28%
16.2%
3
Scientific Reports
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 701 published papers
Top 14%
2.2× avg
4
Journal of Medical Microbiology
Microbiology Society · based on 14 published papers
#1
111× avg
5
Frontiers in Medicine
Frontiers Media SA · based on 99 published papers
Top 3%
7.2× avg
6
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
MDPI AG · based on 116 published papers
Top 6%
3.7× avg
7
eLife
eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd · based on 262 published papers
Top 7%
2.9× avg
8
Frontiers in Microbiology
Frontiers Media SA · based on 36 published papers
Top 0.8%
20× avg
9
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
Frontiers Media SA · based on 22 published papers
Top 1%
17× avg
10
Frontiers in Public Health
Frontiers Media SA · based on 135 published papers
Top 13%
2.4× avg
11
Infection
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 14 published papers
Top 0.2%
47× avg
12
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) · based on 14 published papers
Top 2%
15× avg
13
Frontiers in Immunology
Frontiers Media SA · based on 140 published papers
Top 4%
5.1× avg
14
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 166 published papers
Top 7%
1.7× avg
15
Biology Methods and Protocols
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 19 published papers
Top 1.0%
12× avg
16
Cancers
MDPI AG · based on 57 published papers
Top 6%
2.8× avg
17
PeerJ
PeerJ · based on 46 published papers
Top 6%
4.2× avg
18
Frontiers in Nutrition
Frontiers Media SA · based on 13 published papers
Top 1%
16× avg
19
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
Cambridge University Press (CUP) · based on 17 published papers
Top 1%
15× avg
20
Science of The Total Environment
Elsevier BV · based on 80 published papers
Top 4%
3.9× avg
21
Journal of Clinical Medicine
MDPI AG · based on 77 published papers
Top 15%
0.8%
22
mSystems
American Society for Microbiology · based on 16 published papers
Top 2%
7.6× avg