Back

Initial stage of the COVID-19 virus infection process in human population

Trigger, S. A.

2020-10-21 epidemiology
10.1101/2020.04.13.20063701 medRxiv
Show abstract

The simplest approximation for the first stages of the infection spread is considered. The specific feature of the COVID-19 characterized by its long latent period is taken into account. Exponential increase of numbers of infected people is determined by the half period of the maximal latent time for the COVID-19. The averaging over latent period leads to additional increase of the infected numbers. PACS number(s)02.50.-r, 05.60.-k, 82.39.-k, 87.19.Xx

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
○ 32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.9%
Similar papers in this journal
2
Nonlinear Dynamics
○ 10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.9%
Similar papers in this journal
3
The European Physical Journal Plus
○ 13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
Similar papers in this journal
4
PLOS ONE
● 5266 papers in training set
Top 27%
5.5%
Similar papers in this journal
5
Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics
○ 11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.5%
Similar papers in this journal
6
Physical Review E
● 112 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.9%
7
Journal of Theoretical Biology
○ 162 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.4%
8
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 21%
4.4%
9
Infectious Disease Modelling
○ 54 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
10
Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science
● 17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
11
Frontiers in Physics
○ 21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
12
Mathematical Biosciences
○ 49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.2%
13
Physical Biology
○ 46 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
14
Epidemiology and Infection
◐ 89 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.5%
15
Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications
○ 13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
16
Physical Review Research
● 49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
17
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
○ 92 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
18
Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering
● 23 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
19
Royal Society Open Science
● 214 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
20
PLOS Computational Biology
● 1863 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.1%
21
Entropy
○ 21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
22
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
○ 20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
23
JMIRx Med
◐ 32 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
24
F1000Research
○ 88 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
25
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
○ 128 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
26
Heliyon
○ 152 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
27
COVID
○ 14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
28
Journal of Mathematical Biology
○ 40 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
29
Mathematics
○ 11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
30
Cureus
○ 68 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.