Back

Hormone replacement therapy and elevated breast cancer risk: An artifact of growth acceleration?

Engel, J.; Schubert-Fritschle, G.; Hoelzel, D.

2020-04-07 oncology
10.1101/2020.04.04.20050708
Show abstract

BackgroundAvailable data on accelerated proliferation and increased breast cancer risk due to hormone replacement therapy (HT) are inconsistent. Data on long-term effects of HT are limited. The interaction between several key factors was examined using a model-based approach. MethodsCohorts of 50 year old women, BCs were randomly generated for 30 years based on the age-specific incidence. A control group received a HT that increased the growth of occult BCs. In a 3rd cohort BCs were additionally induced by HT. This model illustrates the interrelationship of important parameters and allows the simulation and comparison of previously published clinical studies. ResultsUsing plausible parameters for BC growth factor (GF) and HT-related effects it was demonstrated that HT caused accelerated growth of occult BCs with an apparent increase in incidence and shortened time to diagnosis. The Womens Health Initiative (WHI) study was reconstructed assuming a GF of 1.43 induced by HT. The decision of millions of women to discontinue or forego HT based on the published risks of the WHI-study in 2002 could explain the marked jump of 6.7% in incidence within a few months. If additional BCs were induced by HT, then these BCs may become apparent after 10 or more years together with those appearing according to the normal incidence. At this time conclusive data on type, timing, and molecular characteristics of HT induced BCs are not yet available. ConclusionThe acceleration in growth of occult BC has been underestimated. Initially HTs can cause an apparent increase in BC incidence thereby explaining the WHI-dependent decrease in 2003. A HT associated BC risk should only be detectable with a delay of ten and more years.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cancers
based on 57 papers
Top 0.6%
15.7%
2
Breast Cancer Research
based on 11 papers
Top 0.1%
13.5%
3
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 49%
10.4%
4
British Journal of Cancer
based on 22 papers
Top 0.5%
6.5%
5
eLife
based on 262 papers
Top 4%
5.2%
50% of probability mass above
6
Frontiers in Oncology
based on 34 papers
Top 2%
4.6%
7
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 41%
4.6%
8
Clinical Cancer Research
based on 22 papers
Top 2%
3.0%
9
JCO Precision Oncology
based on 11 papers
Top 0.8%
2.4%
10
BMC Cancer
based on 21 papers
Top 2%
2.4%
11
Cancer Medicine
based on 17 papers
Top 2%
2.4%
12
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
based on 14 papers
Top 2%
1.8%
13
Frontiers in Genetics
based on 32 papers
Top 3%
1.4%
14
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
based on 26 papers
Top 3%
1.2%
15
PeerJ
based on 46 papers
Top 7%
1.2%
16
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 37%
1.2%
17
Aging
based on 18 papers
Top 4%
0.8%
18
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
based on 100 papers
Top 12%
0.8%
19
JAMA Network Open
based on 125 papers
Top 18%
0.8%
20
International Journal of Cancer
based on 18 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
21
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
based on 14 papers
Top 4%
0.8%
22
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
based on 13 papers
Top 2%
0.7%
23
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
based on 13 papers
Top 3%
0.7%
24
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
based on 17 papers
Top 2%
0.7%
25
BMC Public Health
based on 148 papers
Top 24%
0.7%
26
Genetic Epidemiology
based on 14 papers
Top 0.6%
0.7%
27
International Journal of Epidemiology
based on 65 papers
Top 10%
0.7%