Quantifying the effect of quarantine control in Covid-19 infectious spread using machine learning
Dandekar, R.; Barbastathis, G.
Show abstract
Since the first recording of what we now call Covid-19 infection in Wuhan, Hubei province, China on Dec 31, 2019 (CHP 2020), the disease has spread worldwide and met with a wide variety of social distancing and quarantine policies. The effectiveness of these responses is notoriously difficult to quantify as individuals travel, violate policies deliberately or inadvertently, and infect others without themselves being detected (Li et al. 2020a; Wu & Leung 2020; Wang et al. 2020; Chinazzi et al. 2020; Ferguson et al. 2020; Kraemer et al. 2020). Moreover, the publicly available data on infection rates are themselves unreliable due to limited testing and even possibly under-reporting (Li et al. 2020b). In this paper, we attempt to interpret and extrapolate from publicly available data using a mixed first-principles epidemiological equations and data-driven neural network model. Leveraging our neural network augmented model, we focus our analysis on four locales: Wuhan, Italy, South Korea and the United States of America, and compare the role played by the quarantine and isolation measures in each of these countries in controlling the effective reproduction number Rt of the virus. Our results unequivocally indicate that the countries in which rapid government interventions and strict public health measures for quarantine and isolation were implemented were successful in halting the spread of infection and prevent it from exploding exponentially. In the case of Wuhan especially, where the available data were earliest available, we have been able to test the predicting ability of our model by training it from data in the January 24th till March 3rd window, and then matching the predictions up to April 1st. Even for Italy and South Korea, we have a buffer window of one week (25 March - 1 April) to validate the predictions of our model. In the case of the US, our model captures well the current infected curve growth and predicts a halting of infection spread by 20 April 2020. We further demonstrate that relaxing or reversing quarantine measures right now will lead to an exponential explosion in the infected case count, thus nullifying the role played by all measures implemented in the US since mid March 2020.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- An R t - based model for predicting multiple epidemic waves in a heterogeneous population 94%
- Projection of Healthcare Demand in Germany and Switzerland Urged by Omicron Wave (January-March 2022) 93%
- Mathematical modeling of COVID-19 in British Columbia: an age-structured model with time-dependent contact rates 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Integrating Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks with Ordinary Differential Equations for Efficient, Interpretable and Robust Deep Learning: A Case Study in the Epidemiology of Infectious Diseases 94%
- Incorporating the mutational landscape of SARS-COV-2 variants and case-dependent vaccination rates into epidemic models 94%
- The impact of policy timing on the spread of COVID-19 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of reproduction number on multiwave spreading dynamics of COVID-19 with temporary immunity : a mathematical model 93%
- Estimating the undetected infections in the Covid-19 outbreak by harnessing capture-recapture methods 92%
- Transmission dynamics of the COVID-19 epidemic in India and modelling optimal lockdown exit strategies 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- What can we learn from COVID-19 data by using epidemic models with unidentified infectious cases? 94%
- Deep reinforcement learning framework for controlling infectious disease outbreaks in the context of multi-jurisdictions 93%
- Estimating relative generation times and relative reproduction numbers of Omicron BA.1 and BA.2 with respect to Delta in Denmark 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.