Back

Inferring Timing of Infection Using Within-host SARS-CoV-2 Infection Dynamics Model: Are "Imported Cases" Truly Imported?

Ejima, K.; Kim, K. S.; Ito, Y.; Iwanami, S.; Ohashi, H.; Koizumi, Y.; Watashi, K.; Bento, A. I.; Aihara, K.; Iwami, S.

2020-03-31 public and global health
10.1101/2020.03.30.20040519 medRxiv
Show abstract

In countries/communities at risk of future outbreaks of COVID-19, ascertaining whether cases are imported or the result of local secondary transmission is important for government to shape appropriate public health strategies. In this study, we propose a novel approach to identify the timing of infection, whereby we developed a within-host model to capture viral load dynamics post-symptom onset. We submit our approach allow us to differentiate imported cases from local secondary cases. To illustrate our method, we use the initial reported cases in Singapore, where the first reported 18 cases were considered imported, as these individuals had recent travel history to Wuhan, China, which is a hotspot of COVID-19 outbreak. With additional information regarding day of entrance in Singapore, we were able to infer whether these were infected locally or prior to arriving in Singapore. Of all the cases, we identified 6 as likely evidence of ongoing secondary transmission within Singapore. In an early phase of outbreaks, collecting viral load data over time from cases from symptom onset is highly recommended.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.