Back

Diagnostic Indexes of a Rapid IgG/IgM Combined Antibody Test for SARS-CoV-2

Liu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Diao, B.; Ren, F.; Wang, Y.; Ding, J.; Huang, Q.

2020-03-30 infectious diseases
10.1101/2020.03.26.20044883
Show abstract

[Abstract]O_ST_ABSObjectiveC_ST_ABSCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has become pandemic in the world. The need for IgG-IgM combined antibody test is booming, but data on diagnostic indexes evaluation was inadequate. The aim of this study was to evaluate diagnostic indexes of a rapid IgG-IgM combined antibody test for SARS-CoV-2. MethodsA total of 179 patients were enrolled. Serum were collected for IgG-IgM combined antibody test and corresponding nasal and pharyngeal swab specimens were collected for SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR. According to SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR results, patients under study were categorized as PCR positive group in 90 patients and PCR negative group in 89 patients. Results1. Of the 90 PCR positive samples, 77 were tested positive by SARS-CoV-2 IgG-IgM test kit, yielding a sensitivity of 85.6%. Meanwhile, of the 89 PCR negative sample, 8 samples were detected positive, resulting in a specificity of 91%. Positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of this test kit was 95.1%, 82.7%, and 88.3%, respectively. Kappa efficiency between IgG/IgM test kit and RT-PCR were 0.75. 2. Accuracy in mild/common and severe/critical subgroup were 73.9% and 97.7%, respectively. Accuracy in clinical confirmed, suspected cases and other disease subgroups were 70%, 60%, and 100%, respectively. 3. Patients were further divided into 0 - 7, 8 - 15 and >= 16 groups according to the time from illness onset to sample collection. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy in these three groups were 18.8%, 77.8% and 40%; 100%, 50% and 87.5%; 100%, 64.3%, and 93.9, respectively. ConclusionThe sensitivity and specificity of this ease-of-use IgG/IgM combined test kit were adequate, plus short turnaround time, no specific requirements for additional equipment or skilled technicians, all of these collectively contributed to its competence for mass testing. At the current stage, it cannot take the place of SARA-CoV-2 nucleic acid RT-PCR, but can be served as a complementary option for RT-PCR. The combination of RT-PCR and IgG-IgM combined test kit could provide further insight into SARS-CoV-2 infection diagnosis.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Medical Virology
based on 95 papers
Top 0.2%
12.7%
2
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 57%
7.7%
3
Journal of Clinical Virology
based on 54 papers
Top 0.3%
6.5%
4
Journal of Virological Methods
based on 20 papers
Top 0.3%
5.1%
5
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
based on 115 papers
Top 1%
4.8%
6
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
based on 11 papers
Top 0.1%
4.6%
7
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
based on 77 papers
Top 2%
3.9%
8
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 54%
2.9%
9
Frontiers in Medicine
based on 99 papers
Top 6%
2.9%
50% of probability mass above
10
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
based on 22 papers
Top 1.0%
2.5%
11
Diagnostics
based on 36 papers
Top 2%
2.4%
12
Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy
based on 15 papers
Top 0.1%
2.4%
13
Heliyon
based on 57 papers
Top 3%
2.4%
14
Clinical Infectious Diseases
based on 219 papers
Top 14%
1.6%
15
BioMed Research International
based on 11 papers
Top 1%
1.6%
16
Emerging Infectious Diseases
based on 84 papers
Top 7%
1.6%
17
Frontiers in Public Health
based on 135 papers
Top 20%
1.3%
18
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
based on 14 papers
Top 0.6%
1.3%
19
Emerging Microbes & Infections
based on 20 papers
Top 0.7%
1.3%
20
Journal of Infection
based on 64 papers
Top 4%
1.3%
21
Annals of Translational Medicine
based on 14 papers
Top 3%
1.2%
22
BMC Infectious Diseases
based on 110 papers
Top 16%
0.8%
23
Journal of Medical Microbiology
based on 14 papers
Top 0.9%
0.8%
24
Journal of Infection and Public Health
based on 15 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
25
European Respiratory Journal
based on 44 papers
Top 5%
0.8%
26
Microbiology Spectrum
based on 86 papers
Top 3%
0.8%
27
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
based on 54 papers
Top 5%
0.8%
28
Pathogens
based on 16 papers
Top 0.8%
0.7%
29
Clinical Chemistry
based on 14 papers
Top 2%
0.7%
30
Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
based on 15 papers
Top 0.9%
0.7%