Back

Advance of Novel Coronavirus Registration Clinical Trial

song, g.; cheng, m. q.; wei, x. w.

2020-03-20 epidemiology
10.1101/2020.03.16.20034934 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundTo analyze the characteristics and heterogeneity of clinical trials of Novel Coronavirus(COVID-19) registered in the China Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR), and provide data bases and information references for clinical treatment MethodsStatistics of COVID-19 clinical trials registered with ChiCTR as of February 24, 2020 were collected. Descriptive analysis of registration characteristics. The chi-square test is used to compare statistical differences between different study types, intervention methods, study stage, and Primary sponsor. Results232 COVID-19 studies registered at the ChiCTR were collected. The overall number of COVID-19 registrations was increased. Hubei Province, China has the largest number of registrations. There were significant differences between the number of participants(P=0.000), study duration(P=0.008), study assignment(P=0.000), and blind method(P=0.000) for different study types. Significant differences could be seen in the dimensions of multicenter study(P=0.022), of participants numbe(P=0.000), study duration(P=0.000) and study assignment(P=0.001) for the four intervention methods. There were significant differences in study assignment(P=0.043) between the early and late studies. CMT drugs with high research frequency are chloroquine, lopinavir / ritonavir, and I-IFN; BI was Cell therapy, plasma therapy, Thymosin, and M/P-AB. ConclusionsDifferent study design characteristics have led to significant differences in some aspects of the COVID-19 clinical trial. Timely summary analysis can provide more treatment options and evidence for clinical practice.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.