Back

Timing and factors associated with in-hospital death following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation at a single urban academic hospital

Li, S.; Lazaridis, C.; Goldenberg, F. D.; Shah, A. P.; Tataris, K.; Beiser, D. G.; Sharp, W. W.

2020-03-17 emergency medicine
10.1101/2020.03.15.20029207 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveIn-hospital mortality in patients successfully resuscitated following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is high. The factors and timings of these deaths is not well known. To better understand in hospital post-OHCA mortality we developed a novel categorization system of in hospital death and studied the factors and timings associated with these deaths. MethodsThis was a single-centered retrospective observational human study in adult non-traumatic OHCA patients in a university affiliated hospital. Through an expert consensus process, a novel classification system of hospital death was developed. ResultsTwo hundred and forty-one patients were enrolled in the study. Death was categorized as due to withdrawal of life sustaining treatment (WOLST) 159 (66.0%), recurrent in-hospital cardiac arrest 51 (21.1%), or due to neurological criteria 31 (12.9%). Subcategorization of factors associated with WOLST into 7 categories was done by defined criteria. Inter-reliability of this system was 0.858. 50% of WOLST decisions were due to neurological injury. Early death ([≤] 3 days) was associated with recurrent in-hospital cardiac arrest and WOLST in the setting of refractory shock or multi-organ injury. Late in-hospital death (> 3 days) was primarily due to WOLST decisions in the setting of isolated neurological injury. ConclusionsOHCA in hospital mortality occurred in a bimodal pattern with early deaths due to recurrent arrest and multiorgan injury while late deaths were due to isolated neurological injury. The majority of deaths occurred in the setting of WOLST decisions. Further study of the influence of these factors on post OHCA survival are needed.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.