Back

TagSeqTools: a flexible and comprehensive analysis pipeline for NAD tagSeq data

Zhong, H.; Cai, Z.; Yang, Z.; Xia, Y.

2020-03-09 bioinformatics
10.1101/2020.03.09.982934 bioRxiv
Show abstract

NAD tagSeq has recently been developed for the identification and characterization of NAD+-capped RNAs (NAD-RNAs). This method adopts a strategy of chemo-enzymatic reactions to label the NAD-RNAs with a synthetic RNA tag before subjecting to the Oxford Nanopore direct RNA sequencing. A computational tool designed for analyzing the sequencing data of tagged RNA will facilitate the broader application of this method. Hence, we introduce TagSeqTools as a flexible, general pipeline for the identification and quantification of tagged RNAs (i.e., NAD+-capped RNAs) using long-read transcriptome sequencing data generated by NAD tagSeq method. TagSeqTools comprises two major modules, TagSeek for differentiating tagged and untagged reads, and TagSeqQuant for the quantitative and further characterization analysis of genes and isoforms. Besides, the pipeline also integrates some advanced functions to identify antisense or splicing, and supports the data reformation for visualization. Therefore, TagSeqTools provides a convenient and comprehensive workflow for researchers to analyze the data produced by the NAD tagSeq method or other tagging-based experiments using Oxford nanopore direct RNA sequencing. The pipeline is available at https://github.com/dorothyzh/TagSeqTools, under Apache License 2.0.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
RNA
● 189 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.0%
Similar papers in this journal
2
BMC Genomics
○ 406 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
7.8%
Similar papers in this journal
3
RNA Biology
○ 78 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
Similar papers in this journal
4
Bioinformatics
◐ 1204 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.7%
Similar papers in this journal
5
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
◐ 242 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.7%
Similar papers in this journal
6
Frontiers in Genetics
○ 230 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.2%
7
Genome Biology
○ 637 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
8
Genome Research
● 468 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.0%
9
PeerJ
◐ 308 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
10
BMC Bioinformatics
○ 457 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
11
Genes
○ 144 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
12
Briefings in Bioinformatics
◐ 354 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
13
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.0%
14
Nucleic Acids Research
◐ 1281 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.9%
15
Journal of Genetics and Genomics
○ 38 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
16
Genomics
○ 64 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.5%
17
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
● 242 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
18
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
188 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
19
PLOS ONE
● 5266 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.1%
20
Computational Biology and Chemistry
○ 28 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
21
PLOS Computational Biology
● 1863 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.1%
22
GigaScience
◐ 212 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
23
Life Science Alliance
● 285 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
24
eLife
● 5828 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.9%
25
iScience
○ 1154 papers in training set
Top 36%
0.8%
26
Plant and Cell Physiology
◐ 52 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
27
The Plant Journal
○ 215 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
28
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
○ 494 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.8%
29
Horticulture Research
◐ 47 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
30
F1000Research
○ 88 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.