Clinical characterization and chest CT findings in laboratory-confirmed COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Vaseghi, G.; Mansourian, M.; Karimi, R.; Heshmat-Ghahdarijani, K.; Baradaran Mahdavi, S.; Pezeshki, A.; Ataei, B.; Zandifar, A.; Shafaat, O.; Haghjoo Javanmard, S.
Show abstract
BackgroundImagery techniques have been used as essential parts of diagnostic workup for patients suspected for 2019-nCoV infection, Multiple studies have reported the features of chest computed tomography (CT) scans among a number of 2019-nCoV patients. MethodStudy Identification was carried out in databases (PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library) to identify published studies examining the diagnosis, the 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV). Heterogeneity among reported prevalence was assessed by computing p-values of Cochrane Q-test and I2 -statics. The pooled prevalence of treatment failure was carried out with a fixed effects meta-analysis model, generating the pooled 95% confidence interval. A random-effect model was used to pool the results since this model could incorporate the heterogeneity of the studies and therefore proved a more generalized result. ResultsAccording to the combined results of meta-analysis, the total 55% of corona patients were males. The mean age of the patients was 41.31 (34.14, 48.47). Two prevalent clinical symptoms between patients were fever, cough with prevalence of 85%, and 62%, respectively. Either Ground Glass Opacity GGO or consolidation was seen in 86% but 14% had NO GGO or consolidation. The other rare CT symptoms were pericardial effusion, and pleural effusion with 4, 5, 7% prevalence, respectively. The most prevalent event was Either GGO or consolidation in 85% of patients. ConclusionThe most CT-scan abnormality is Either Ground Glass Opacity GGO or consolidation however in few patients none of them might be observed, so trusting in just CT findings will lead to miss some patients.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients in Kuwait 95%
- Survival analysis of hospital length of stay of novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pneumonia patients in Sichuan, China 95%
- Clinical Laboratory Parameters Associated with Severe or Critical Novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Impact of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) on Liver Injury in China: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis 92%
- Combination therapy of Tocilizumab and steroid for management of COVID-19 associated cytokine release syndrome: A single center experience from Pune, Western India 92%
- The PBL teaching method in Neurology Education in the Traditional Chinese Medicine undergraduate students: An Observational Study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Patients at risk of pulmonary fibrosis Post Covid-19: Epidemiology, pulmonary sequelaes and humoral response 93%
- Normalized Semi-Covariance Co-Efficiency Analysis of Spike Proteins from SARS-CoV-2 variant Omicron and Other Coronaviruses for their Infectivity and Virulence 92%
- Adverse events following COVID-19 virus vaccination in Japanese young population: The first cross-sectional study conducted by a questionnaire survey after the first-time-injection 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Novel Triage Tool of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Diagnosis Aid System for Suspected COVID-19 Pneumonia in Fever Clinics 94%
- Chest Computed Tomography for the Diagnosis of Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A Rapid Review and Meta-Analysis 94%
- Supportive Care for Patient with Respiratory Diseases: An Umbrella Review 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Post mortem pathological findings in COVID-19 cases: A Systematic Review 95%
- Comparative study between first and second wave of COVID-19 deaths in India - a single center study 93%
- Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Laboratory-Confirmed SARS-CoV-2 Cases Infected with Omicron subvariants and XBB recombinant variant 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.