Sex differences in clinical findings among patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and severe condition
Li, J.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, F.; Liu, B.; Li, H.; Tang, G.; Chang, Z.; Liu, A.; Fu, C.; Gao, J.; Li, J.
Show abstract
ObjectiveTo compare the sex differences in the clinical findings among patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). MethodsWe retrospectively collected data of 47 patients diagnosed as severe type of COVID-19 from February 8 to 22, 2020, including demographics, illness history, physical examination, laboratory test, management, and compared differences between men and women. ResultsOf the 47 patients, 28 (59.6%) were men. The median age was 62 years, and 30 (63.8%) had comorbidities. The initial symptoms were mainly fever (34 [72.3%]), cough (36 [76.6%]), myalgia (5 [10.6%]) and fatigue (7 [14.9%]). Procalcitonin level was higher in men than in women (0.08 vs. 0.04ng/ml, p=0.002). N-terminal-pro brain natriuretic peptide increased in 16 (57.1%) men and 5 (26.3%) women (p=0.037). Five men (17.9%) had detected positive influenza A antibody, but no women. During 2-week admission, 5 (17.9%) men and 1 (5.3%) woman were reclassified into the critical type due to deterioration. Mortality was 3.6% in men and 0 in women respectively. Four (21.1%) women and one man (3.6%) recovered and discharged from hospital. ConclusionSex differences may exist in COVID-19 patients of severe type. Men are likely to have more complicated clinical condition and worse in-hospital outcomes as compared to women.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessing the impact of the Gamma variant on COVID-19 Patient admissions in a Southern Brazilian tertiary hospital - A comparison of dual pandemic phases 95%
- Clinical characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients in Kuwait 95%
- Epidemiological, clinical, and laboratory findings for patients of different age groups with confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in a hospital in Saudi Arabia 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Chest CT Features of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China: A Meta-analysis of 19 Trials 90%
- Multicenter performance evaluation of a novel rapid molecular point-of-care test to detect influenza using nasopharyngeal swabs and gargle samples 90%
- Prediction and Evolution of B Cell Epitopes of Surface Protein in SARS-CoV-2 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Post mortem pathological findings in COVID-19 cases: A Systematic Review 93%
- Comparative study between first and second wave of COVID-19 deaths in India - a single center study 93%
- Clinical diagnosis of COVID-19: a prompt, feasible, and sensitive diagnostic tool for COVID-19 based on a 1,757-patient cohort (The AndroCoV Clinical Scoring for COVID-19 diagnosis) 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Combination therapy of Tocilizumab and steroid for management of COVID-19 associated cytokine release syndrome: A single center experience from Pune, Western India 92%
- The Impact of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) on Liver Injury in China: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis 91%
- Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies Among 925 Staff Members in an Urban Hospital Accepting COVID-19 Patients in Osaka Prefecture, Japan 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of triage checklist for mild COVID-19 outpatients in predicting subsequent emergency department visits and hospitalization during isolation period 94%
- Incubation Period and Other Epidemiological Characteristics of 2019 Novel Coronavirus Infections with Right Truncation: A Statistical Analysis of Publicly Available Case Data 92%
- Early Outpatient Treatment Of COVID-19: A Retrospective Analysis Of 392 Cases In Italy 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.