Back

Forelimb unloading impairs glenohumeral muscle development in growing rats

Tushak, S. K.; Tamburro, M. K.; Fawcett, E. B.; Merritt, L. E.; Saul, K. R.; Cole, J. H.

2020-02-27 bioengineering
10.1101/2020.02.26.967273 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Proper joint loading is essential for healthy musculoskeletal development. Many pediatric neuromuscular disorders cause irreversible muscle impairments resulting from both physiological changes and mechanical unloading of the joint. While previous studies have examined the effects of hindlimb unloading on musculoskeletal development in the lower limb, none have examined solely forelimb unloading. Thus, a large deficit in knowledge of the effect of upper limb unloading exists and must be addressed in order to better understand how the glenohumeral joint adapts during development. Two forelimb unloading models were developed to study the effects of varying degrees of unloading on the glenohumeral joint in growing rats: forelimb suspension (n=6, intervention 21 days post-natal) with complete unloading of both limbs via a novel suspension system and forearm amputation (n=8, intervention 3-6 days post-natal) with decreased loading and limb use in one limb after below-elbow amputation. After 8 weeks of unloading, changes in muscle architecture and composition were examined in ten muscles surrounding the shoulder. Results were compared to control rats from a previous study (n=8). Both methods of altered loading significantly affected muscle mass, sarcomere length, and optimal muscle length compared to control rats, with the biceps long head and triceps long head observing the most marked differences. Forearm amputation also significantly affected muscle mass, sarcomere length, and optimal muscle length in the affected limb relative to the contralateral limb. Muscle composition, assessed by collagen content, remained unchanged in all groups. This study demonstrated that forearm amputation, which was administered closer to birth, had greater effects on muscle than forelimb suspension, which was administered a few weeks later than amputation.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.