Back

Expression profiles of circRNAs, lncRNAs, and mRNAs in extreme phenotypes of diabetic retinopathy

Zhou, R.; Liu, S.; Wang, W.; Cheng, W.; He, M.; Xiong, K.; Gong, X.; Li, Y.; Huang, W.

2020-02-20 ophthalmology
10.1101/2020.02.15.20023481 medRxiv
Show abstract

Recent evidences highlighted regulatory role of circular RNAs (circRNAs) and long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) in the development of diabetic retinopathy (DR). However, the literatures and number of the RNAs identified were limited. Here, we compared the expression profiles of circRNAs, lncRNAs, and mRNAs in the blood of the susceptible individuals who developed severe DR within 5 years after being diagnosed with type 2 diabetic mellitus (T2DM), and the inherently resistant individuals who are spared from DR despite over 20-year history of T2DM. Using RNA microarray, hundreds of significantly differently expressed circRNAs, lncRNAs, and dozens of mRNAs were identified. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction verified the above findings. Gene ontology analysis indicated that the differentially expressed circRNAs were involved in platelet-derived growth factor binding, and mRNA and the cis-target genes of lncRNA participate in negative regulation of the Wnt signaling pathway. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway analysis suggested that the differentially expressed circRNAs were related to vitamin B6 metabolism and type 2 diabetes. The cis-target genes of lncRNAs are enriched in valine, leucine, and isoleucine biosynthesis and in the hypoxia-inducible factor-1 signaling pathway. The trans-target genes of lncRNAs are enriched in pathways such as vitamin B6 metabolism. Differentially expressed mRNAs are associated with type 2 diabetes and the vascular endothelial growth factor signaling pathway. Our findings demonstrate that circRNAs and lncRNAs may be involved in the regulation of DR and lay a foundation for further researches into the underlying mechanisms.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.