Achilles tendon stiffness minimizes the energy cost in simulations of walking in older but not in young adults
Delabastita, T.; De Groote, F.; Vanwanseele, B.
Show abstract
Both Achilles tendon stiffness and walking patterns influence the energy cost of walking, but their relative contributions remain unclear. These independent contributions can only be investigated using simulations. We created models for 16 young (24{+/-}2 years) and 15 older (75{+/-}4 years) subjects, with individualized (using optimal parameter estimations) and generic triceps surae muscle-tendon parameters. We varied Achilles tendon stiffness and calculated the energy cost of walking. Both in young and older adults, Achilles tendon stiffness independently contributed to the energy cost of walking. However, overall, a 25% increase in Achilles tendon stiffness increased the triceps surae and whole-body energy cost of walking with approximately 7% and 1.5%, respectively. Therefore, the influence of Achilles tendon stiffness is rather limited. Walking patterns also independently contributed to the energy cost of walking because the plantarflexor (including, but not limited to the triceps surae) energy cost of walking was lower in older than in young adults. Hence, training interventions should probably rather target specific walking patterns than Achilles tendon stiffness to decrease the energy cost of walking. However, based on the results of previous experimental studies, we expected that the calculated hip extensor and whole-body energy cost of walking would be higher in older than in young adults. This was not confirmed in our results. Future research might therefore assess the contribution of the walking pattern to the energy cost of walking by individualizing maximal isometric muscle force and by using three-dimensional models of muscle contraction. Summary statementAchilles tendon stiffness and walking patterns independently contribute to the energy cost in simulations of walking in young and older adults. The influence of Achilles tendon stiffness is rather small.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Simple models highlight differences in the walking biomechanics of young children and adults 97%
- Soft tissue deformations explain most of the mechanical work variations of human walking 97%
- Habitual foot strike pattern does not affect simulated Triceps Surae muscle metabolic energy consumption during running 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Vertebral level specific modulation of paraspinal muscle activity based on vestibular signals during walking. 96%
- Role Of Forelimb Morphology In Muscle Sensorimotor Functions During Locomotion In The Cat 95%
- Facilitation-inhibition control of motor neuronal persistent inward currents in young and older adults 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Running with an exotendon reduces compressive knee contact force 97%
- Can foot placement during gait be trained? Adaptations in stability control when ankle moments are constrained 97%
- The effect of constraining mediolateral ankle moments and foot placement on the use of the counter-rotation mechanism during walking 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Functional Electrical Stimulation of the Soleus Redistributes Lower-Limb Joint Work Distally in Young and Older Adults 98%
- Transtibial amputation increases the metabolic energy needed for stabilizing walking in the sagittal plane 96%
- Speeding up, not slowing down, decreases the energy needed to control walking balance 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Transfemoral limb loss modestly increases the metabolic cost of optimal control simulations of walking 97%
- The energetic effect of hip flexion and retraction in walking at different speeds: a modeling study 96%
- Geometric variation of the human tibia-fibula: A public dataset of tibia-fibula surface meshes and statistical shape model 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.