Development and validation of the Irish Science Self-Efficacy Children's Questionnaire to assess the short-term influence of scientists facilitating outreach
Carroll, S.; Sheahan, J.; McCauley, V.; Grenon, M.
Show abstract
Despite the positive relationship between science self-efficacy and science motivation, and the prevalence of scientist-led outreach programs, there is limited research on the effect of scientists on childrens science self-efficacy beliefs. Furthermore, there is no extant science self-efficacy research on primary pupils in Ireland, possibly due to the absence of a suitable and valid assessment instrument. This multi-study research aimed to develop and validate a questionnaire suitable for investigating the effect of scientist-facilitated science outreach on the science self-efficacy of children aged 11-12 years old. In Study 1 the first version of the Irish Science Self-Efficacy Childrens Questionnaire (IS-SEC-Q) was developed and tested with 92 primary school students. In Study 2, the revised questionnaire was re-tested with 282 students. For both studies, construct validity was examined through factor analysis. Questionnaire interpretation and comprehension were investigated via interviews (N=4 and 25 respectively). In Study 2, convergent and criterion validity of the scales was also examined. The final IS-SEC-Q contained 5 scales (63 items), including an adaptation of Usher and Pajares Sources of Self-Efficacy in Mathematics scale. Study 2 interviews indicated possible misinterpretations of the Emotional State subscale. The questionnaire demonstrated good psychometric properties and should serve well for informal science education practitioners endeavouring to assess their impact on primary childrens science self-efficacy.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A Framework to Identify Opportunities to Address Socioscientific Issues in the Elementary School Curricula: A Case Study from England, Italy, and Portugal 96%
- Relationship between Students' Attitude towards, and Performance in Mathematics Word Problems 95%
- A national professional development program fills mentoring gaps for postdoctoral researchers 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- The measurement properties and acceptability of a new parent-infant bonding tool (‘Me and My Baby’) designed for use in a universal healthcare setting in the UK 93%
- ‘Kindness By Post’: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation of A Participatory Public Mental Health Project 92%
- Measurement of motivation states for physical activity and sedentary behavior: Development and validation of the CRAVE scale 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Child health, nutrition and gut microbiota development during the first two years of life; study protocol of a prospective cohort study from the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan 90%
- Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the 5C Scale to Identify Factors Associated With COVID-19 and Influenza Vaccine Hesitancy Among Healthcare Workers in Cape Town, South Africa – A Protocol 90%
- Taxonomy of interventions at academic institutions to improve research quality 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Anticipatory Emotions and Academic Performance: The Role of Boredom in a Preservice Teachers' Lab Experience 94%
- Self-learning on COVID-19 among medical students and their preparedness to participate in government's COVID-19 response in Bhutan: a cross-sectional study 93%
- Perceptions of Complementary, Alternative, and Integrative Medicine: Insights from a Large-Scale International Cross-Sectional Survey of Surgery Researchers and Clinicians 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting intention to receive COVID-19 vaccine among the general population using the Health Belief Model and the Theory of Planned Behavior Model 92%
- Parents’ intention to vaccinate their 5-11 years old children with the COVID-19 vaccine: rates, predictors and the role of incentives 92%
- Feasibility and acceptability of daily testing at school as an alternative to self-isolation following close contact with a confirmed case of COVID-19: A qualitative analysis 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.