Back

Retrospective evaluation of a filtering trabeculotomy in comparison to conventional trabeculectomy by exact matching

Strzalkowska, A. M.; Strzalkowski, P.; Al Yousef, Y.; Hillenkamp, J.; Grehn, F.; Loewen, N.

2020-01-18 ophthalmology
10.1101/2020.01.17.20017913
Show abstract

PurposeTo compare 2-year results of a filtering trabeculotomy (FTO) to conventional trabeculectomy (TE) in open-angle glaucoma by exact matching. Methods110 patients received an FTO and 86 a TE. FTO avoided the need for an iridectomy due to a preserved trabeculo-Descemet window anterior to the scleral flap. TE employed a trabecular block excision and iridectomy. Mitomycin C was used in both. FTO and TE were exact-matched by baseline intraocular pressure (IOP) and the number of glaucoma medications. Complete and qualified success (IOP [≤]18 mmHg and IOP reduction [≥] 30%, with or without medication) were primary endpoints. IOP, visual acuity (BCVA), complications and intervention were secondary endpoints. Results44 FTO were exact-matched to 44 TE. The IOP baseline in both groups was 22.5{+/-}4.7 mmHg on 3{+/-}0.9 medications. At 24 months, complete success was reached by 59% in FTO and 66% in TE and qualified success by 59% in FTO and 71% in TE. In FTO, IOP was reduced to 12.4{+/-}4.3 mmHg at 12 months and 13.1{+/-}4.1 mmHg at 24 months. In TE, IOP was 11.3{+/-}2.2 mmHg at 12 months and 12.0{+/-}3.5 mmHg at 24 months. Medications could be reduced at 24 months to 0.6{+/-}1.3 in FTO and 0.2{+/-}0.5 in TE. There were no significant differences between the two groups in IOP, medications, complications or interventions at any point. ConclusionModifying aqueous flow through a limited trabeculotomy in FTO yielded clinical outcomes similar to traditional TE but allowed to avoid an iridectomy.

Matching journals

1
British Journal of Ophthalmology
BMJ · based on 13 published papers
#1
185× avg
2
Translational Vision Science & Technology
Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO) · based on 18 published papers
Top 0.2%
133× avg
3
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 33%
14.7%
4
Eye
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 11 published papers
#1
153× avg
5
Ophthalmology Science
Elsevier BV · based on 15 published papers
Top 0.6%
70× avg
6
F1000Research
F1000 Research Ltd · based on 28 published papers
#1
32× avg
7
Scientific Reports
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 701 published papers
Top 35%
5.2%
8
Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science
Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO) · based on 11 published papers
Top 0.7%
42× avg
9
Cureus
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 64 published papers
Top 9%
2.5× avg
10
BMJ Open
BMJ · based on 553 published papers
Top 42%
1.5%
11
Journal of Clinical Medicine
MDPI AG · based on 77 published papers
Top 12%
2.3× avg
12
Vaccines
MDPI AG · based on 131 published papers
Top 4%
4.1× avg
13
British Journal of Cancer
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 22 published papers
Top 3%
5.7× avg
14
Frontiers in Medicine
Frontiers Media SA · based on 99 published papers
Top 16%
0.9%
15
Journal of Medical Internet Research
JMIR Publications Inc. · based on 81 published papers
Top 15%
0.7%
16
Clinical and Translational Science
Wiley · based on 14 published papers
Top 2%
8.2× avg