Back

Pilot assessment of low NK cell-mediated ADCC and FCGR3A genetics in myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS): Based on inclusion of family members without ME/CFS as controls, low ADCC is unsuitable as a diagnostic biomarker

Sung, A. P.; Tang, J. J.-J.; Guglielmo, M. J.; Smith-Gagen, J.; Bateman, L.; Redelman, D. D.; Hudig, D.

2019-12-27 allergy and immunology
10.1101/2019.12.20.19015438 medRxiv
Show abstract

ADCC (antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity) is dependent on the varying capacity of NK cells to kill, the affinities of FCGR3A-encoded CD16A receptors for antibody, and the presence of antigen-specific antibodies. In vivo ADCC depends on the number of CD16A receptor-positive NK cells in blood. We hypothesized that low ADCC cell function or low effector cell numbers could be biomarkers or risk factors for myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS). We measured NK cell ADCC lytic capacity and antibody recognition, CD16Apositive NK cells/{micro}l blood, and FCGR3A homozygosity for the F allele that encodes low affinity CD16A antibody receptors. ME/CFS patients met the Fukuda 1994 diagnostic criteria. In this pilot report, we examined 5 families, each with 2 to 5 ME/CFS patients, and compared 11 patients, 22 family members without ME/CFS, and 16 unrelated healthy controls. ADCC was measured as CX1:1 cytotoxic capacity (the percentage of 51Cr-Daudi tumors with obinutuzumab anti-CD20 antibody that were killed at a 1:1 ratio of CD16Apos NKs to Daudis) and CX-slope. Individual CX1:1 capacities varied from 16.2% to 81.8% and were comparable between patients and unaffected family members, while the ADCC of both family groups was lower than the unrelated healthy controls. The lack of difference between patients and their unaffected family members indicates that low ADCC is unsuitable as a diagnostic biomarker for ME/CFS. Familial CD16Apos NK blood cell counts were lower than unrelated healthy controls. The potential for synergistic effects of combined low CX1:1 and low effector cell counts occurring in the same individual was 24-fold greater for CFS family members than for unrelated controls. FCGR3A of the families was predominantly F/F homozygous, correlating with the observed low EC50 for NK recognition of target cell-bound antibody. In summary, low ADCC is unsuitable as a biomarker, but could be a familial risk factor, for ME/CFS.

Matching journals

The top 13 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
8.8%
2
Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
3
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.1%
4
Immunology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.1%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 32%
4.5%
6
The Journal of Immunology
146 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.1%
7
Clinical Immunology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.8%
8
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
9
ImmunoHorizons
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
10
Life Science Alliance
263 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
11
Clinical and Experimental Immunology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
12
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
105 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
13
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
50% of probability mass above
14
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
15
Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
16
Pharmaceuticals
33 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
17
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.6%
18
Journal of Clinical Pathology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
19
Neurobiology of Disease
134 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
20
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
21
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
22
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
23
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 52%
0.9%
24
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
25
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 59%
0.9%
26
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
27
European Journal of Immunology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
28
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
29
The Lancet Rheumatology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
30
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%