Structural clusters of histone H3 and H4 residues regulate chronological lifespan in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Ngubo, M.; Reid, J. L.; Patterton, H. -G.
Show abstract
We have performed a comprehensive analysis of the involvement of histone H3 and H4 residues in the regulation of chronological lifespan in yeast, and identify four structural groups in the nucleosome that influence lifespan. We also identify residues where substitution with an epigenetic mimic extends lifespan, providing evidence that a simple epigenetic switch, without possible additional background modifications, causes longevity. Residues where substitution result in the most pronounced lifespan extension are all on the exposed face of the nucleosome, with the exception of H3E50, which is present on the lateral surface, between two DNA gyres. Other residues that have a more modest effect on lifespan extension are concentrated at the extremities of the H3-H4 dimer, suggesting a role in stabilizing the dimer in its nucleosome frame. Residues that reduce lifespan are buried in the histone handshake motif, suggesting that these mutations destabilize the octamer structure. All residues exposed on the nucleosome disk face and that cause lifespan extension are known to interact with Sir3. We find that substitution of H4K16 and H4H18 cause Sir3 to redistribute from telomeres and silent mating loci to secondary positions, often enriched for Rap1, Abf1 or Reb1 binding sites, whereas H3E50 does not. The redistribution of Sir3 in the genome can be reproduced by an equilibrium model based on primary and secondary binding sites with different affinities for Sir3. The redistributed Sir3 cause transcriptional repression at most of the new loci, including of genes where null mutants were previously shown to extend chronological lifespan. The transcriptomic profiles of H4K16 and H4H18 mutant strains are very similar, and compatible with a DNA replication stress response. This is distinct from the transcriptomic profile of H3E50, which matches strong induction of oxidative phosphorylation. We propose that the different groups of residues are involved in binding to heterochromatin proteins, in destabilizing the association of the nucleosome DNA, disrupting binding of the H3-H4 dimer in the nucleosome, or disrupting the structural stability of the octamer, each category impacting on chronological lifespan by a different mechanism.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Substrate-Specific Effects of Natural Genetic Variation on Proteasome Activity 95%
- Chromatin modifiers and recombination factors promote a telomere fold-back structure, that is lost during replicative senescence 95%
- R-loops and regulatory changes in chronologically ageing fission yeast cells drive non-random patterns of genome rearrangements 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Inhibition of MRN activity by a telomere protein motif 96%
- Timely lagging strand maturation relies on Ubp10-mediated PCNA dissociation from replicating chromatin 95%
- Homologous recombination induced by a replication fork barrier requires cooperation between strand invasion and strand annealing activities 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- TERRA increases at short telomeres in yeast survivors and regulates survivor associated senescence (SAS) 96%
- Replicative aging is associated with loss of genetic heterogeneity from extrachromosomal circular DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae 96%
- The conserved elongation factor Spn1 is required for normal transcription, histone modifications, and splicing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Loss of Ku’s DNA end binding activity affects telomere length via destabilizing telomere-bound Est1 rather than altering TLC1 homeostasis 96%
- Sequential deregulation of histone marks, chromatin accessibility and gene expression in response to PROTAC-induced degradation of ASH2L 94%
- Homeostatic maintenance and age-related functional decline in the Drosophila ear 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.