Back

Brain-Computer Interface Robotics for Hand Rehabilitation After Stroke: A Systematic Review

Baniqued, P. D. E.; Stanyer, E. C.; Awais, M.; Alazmani, A.; Jackson, A. E.; Mon-Williams, M. A.; Mushtaq, F.; Holt, R. J.

2019-12-15 rehabilitation medicine and physical therapy
10.1101/2019.12.11.19014571
Show abstract

BackgroundHand rehabilitation is core to helping stroke survivors regain activities of daily living. Recent studies have suggested that the use of electroencephalography-based brain-computer interfaces (BCI) can promote this process. Here, we report the first systematic examination of the literature on the use of BCI-robot systems for the rehabilitation of fine motor skills associated with hand movement and profile these systems from a technical and clinical perspective. MethodsA search for January 2010-October 2019 articles using Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, PEDro, PsycINFO, IEEE Xplore and Cochrane Library databases was performed. The selection criteria included BCI-hand robotic systems for rehabilitation at different stages of development involving tests on healthy participants or people who have had a stroke. Data fields include those related to study design, participant characteristics, technical specifications of the system, and clinical outcome measures. Results30 studies were identified as eligible for qualitative review and among these, 11 studies involved testing a BCI-hand robot on chronic and subacute stroke patients. Statistically significant improvements in motor assessment scores relative to controls were observed for three BCI-hand robot interventions. The degree of robot control for the majority of studies was limited to triggering the device to perform grasping or pinching movements using motor imagery. Most employed a combination of kinaesthetic and visual response via the robotic device and display screen, respectively, to match feedback to motor imagery. Conclusion19 out of 30 studies on BCI-robotic systems for hand rehabilitation report systems at prototype or pre-clinical stages of development. Three studies report statistically significant improvements in functional recovery after stroke, but there is a need to develop a standard protocol for assessing technical and clinical outcomes so that the necessary evidence base on efficiency and efficacy can be developed.

Matching journals

1
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 14 published papers
#1
149× avg
2
Frontiers in Neurology
Frontiers Media SA · based on 74 published papers
Top 0.4%
26× avg
3
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 34%
14.1%
4
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
SAGE Publications · based on 11 published papers
Top 0.2%
106× avg
5
Stroke
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 29 published papers
Top 1%
23× avg
6
NeuroImage: Clinical
Elsevier BV · based on 77 published papers
Top 4%
6.8× avg
7
Gait & Posture
Elsevier BV · based on 11 published papers
Top 1%
26× avg
8
BMJ Open
BMJ · based on 553 published papers
Top 37%
2.1%
9
Journal of Neural Engineering
IOP Publishing · based on 19 published papers
Top 1%
19× avg
10
F1000Research
F1000 Research Ltd · based on 28 published papers
Top 1%
9.5× avg
11
Scientific Reports
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 701 published papers
Top 74%
1.5%
12
Journal of Clinical Medicine
MDPI AG · based on 77 published papers
Top 12%
2.3× avg
13
Brain Stimulation
Elsevier BV · based on 27 published papers
Top 2%
11× avg
14
Trials
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 24 published papers
Top 3%
5.7× avg
15
Neurology
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 38 published papers
Top 6%
2.7× avg
16
Brain and Behavior
Wiley · based on 19 published papers
Top 4%
5.4× avg
17
Human Brain Mapping
Wiley · based on 53 published papers
Top 6%
2.3× avg
18
Clinical Neurophysiology
Elsevier BV · based on 19 published papers
Top 2%
7.6× avg