Use of consensus term and definition for delayed cerebral ischaemia after aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage
Rowland, M. J.; Pattinson, K. T. S.; Vergouwen, M. D.; Watkinson, P. J.
Show abstract
Background and purposeIn 2010, a multidisciplinary research group proposed a consensus term and definition for the complication of delayed cerebral ischaemia (DCI) following aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH). We assessed the use of this term and its definition as an endpoint in observational studies and clinical trials. MethodsFirstly, we performed a MEDLINE abstract search from Jan 2008 to Dec 2017 for observational cohort studies and clinical trials to investigate the used terminology over the years. Next, we studied trends in citations of the original paper citing the consensus definitions since publication in 2010. ResultsThe number of publications citing the 2010 consensus definitions has steadily increased from 18 in 2011 to 54 in 2017. Between 2010 and 2017, 527 papers were published with delayed cerebral ischemia, or another term to describe the same complication, as an endpoint. However, the term delayed cerebral ischemia was used only in 131/527 (25%) of papers and only 14/81 (17%) of clinical trials/cohort studies published in 2017 cited the consensus definitions when outlining study endpoints. ConclusionsDespite publication of consensus terminology and definitions for DCI in 2010, the majority of cohort studies and clinical trials in patients with SAH are not using these. Researchers and editors should be reminded of the importance of using these consensus terminology and definitions in future studies, which will promote the comparability of results between studies, understand the true impact of an intervention, aggregate results in meta-analyses, and construct guidelines with a high level of evidence.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Intravenous Thrombolysis for Acute Central Retinal Artery Occlusion: Protocol For a Systematic Review and Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials 94%
- Serum fibrinogen level and fibrinogen administration in patients with traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol 94%
- Confounding adjustment performance of ordinal analysis methods in stroke studies 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Large Core Thrombectomy: Feasibility Of Simplified Protocol In Resource-Limited Settings 94%
- Computed tomography perfusion parameters predictive of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage after mechanical thrombectomy in patients with cerebral large vessel occlusion 93%
- Long term stability of patients undergoing endovascular parent artery occlusion of their intracranial artery 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Short-term Functional Outcomes of Patients with acute intracerebral hemorrhage in the Native and Expatriate Population 94%
- Endovascular thrombectomy: an effective and safe therapy for perioperative ischemic stroke 93%
- Workflow Intervals andOutcomesof Endovascular Treatment for Acute Large-Vessel Occlusion During On- Versus Off-Hours in China The ANGEL-ACT Registry 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Future Promises, Perils, and Practicalities 95%
- Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Tenecteplase and Alteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Pairwise and Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials 93%
- Cerebral Microvascular Injury in Severe COVID-19 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Risk factors for severe outcomes of COVID-19: a rapid review 92%
- Original Research; Quality Assessment And Comparative Analysis On The Recommendations Of Current Guidelines On Screening And Diagnosis Of Peripheral Arterial Disease; A Systematic Review 92%
- Management and outcomes of myelomeningocele-associated hydrocephalus in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.