Alcohol causes an increased risk of head and neck but not breast cancer in individuals from the UK Biobank study: A Mendelian randomisation analysis.
Ingold, N.; Amin, H. A.; Drenos, F.
Show abstract
ABSTACTAlcohol intake and the risk of various types of cancers have been previously correlated. Correlation though does not always mean that a causal relationship between the two is present. Excessive alcohol consumption is also correlated with other lifestyle factors and behaviours, such as smoking and increased adiposity, that also affect the risk of cancer and make the identification and estimation of the causal effect of alcohol on cancer difficult. Here, using individual level data for 322,193 individuals from the UK Biobank, we report the observational and causal effects of alcohol consumption on types of cancer previously suggested as correlated to alcohol. Alcohol was observationally associated with cancers of the lower digestive system, head and neck and breast cancer. No associations were observed when we considered those keeping alcohol consumption below the recommended threshold of 14 units/week. When Mendelian randomisation was used to assess the causal effect of alcohol on cancer, we found that increasing alcohol consumption, especially above the recommended level, was causal to head and neck cancers but not breast cancer. Our results where replicated using a two sample MR method and data from the much larger COGS genome wide analysis of breast cancer. We conclude that alcohol is causally related to head and neck cancers, especially cancer of larynx, but the observed association with breast cancer are likely due to confounding. The suggested threshold of 14 units/week appears suitable to manage the risk of cancer due to alcohol.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Associations of plasma omega-6 and omega-3 fatty acids with overall and 19 site-specific cancers: a population-based cohort study in UK Biobank 93%
- Long-Term Impact of Stressful Life Events on Breast Cancer Risk: A 36-Year Genetically Informed Prospective Study in the Finnish Twin Cohort 92%
- Methylation scores for smoking, alcohol consumption, and body mass index and risk of seven types of cancer 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Risk of cancer in regular and low meat-eaters, fish-eaters, and vegetarians: a prospective analysis of UK Biobank participants 92%
- Meat consumption and risk of 25 common conditions: outcome-wide analyses in 475,000 men and women in the UK Biobank study 91%
- Investigating the effect of sexual behaviour on oropharyngeal cancer risk: a methodological assessment of Mendelian randomization 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Red meat intake interacts with a TGF-β-pathway-based polygenic risk score to impact colorectal cancer risk: Application of a novel approach for polygenic risk score construction. 91%
- The Multiethnic Cohort: A Resource for the study of Genetic and non-Genetic Cancer Risk Across Populations 90%
- Hereditary haemochromatosis beyond liver cancer: increased risk of prostate cancer during an 11-year follow-up 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Concurrent validity of an Estimator of Weekly Alcohol Consumption (EWAC) based on the Extended AUDIT 92%
- Moderators of changes in smoking, drinking, and quitting behaviour associated with the first Covid-19 lockdown in England 92%
- COVID-19, smoking, vaping and quitting: A representative population survey in England 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Meat intake and cancer risk: prospective analyses in UK Biobank 94%
- Healthy lifestyle, genetic risk, and incidence of cancer: A prospective cohort study of 13 cancer types 91%
- Appraising causal relationships of dietary, nutritional and physical-activity exposures with overall and aggressive prostate cancer: two-sample Mendelian randomization study based on 79,148 prostate cancer cases and 61,106 controls 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.