Back

Vaccination and the evolution of seasonal influenza

Wen, F. T.; Malani, A.; Cobey, S.

2019-07-23 evolutionary biology
10.1101/162545 bioRxiv
Show abstract

1Although vaccines against seasonal influenza are designed to protect against circulating strains, by affecting the emergence and transmission of antigenically divergent strains, they might also change the rate of antigenic evolution. Vaccination might slow antigenic evolution by increasing immunity, reducing the chance that even antigenically diverged strains can survive. Vaccination also reduces prevalence, decreasing the supply of potentially beneficial mutations and increasing the probability of stochastic extinction. But vaccination might accelerate antigenic evolution by increasing the transmission advantage of more antigenically diverged strains relative to less diverged strains (i.e., by positive selection). Such evolutionary effects could affect vaccinations direct benefits to individuals and indirect benefits to the host population (i.e., the private and social benefits). To investigate these potential impacts, we simulated the dynamics of an influenza-like pathogen with seasonal vaccination. On average, more vaccination decreased the rate of viral antigenic evolution and the incidence of disease. Notably, this decrease was driven partly by a vaccine-induced decline in the rate of antigenic evolution. To understand how the evolutionary effects of vaccines might affect their social and private benefits, we fitted linear panel models to simulated data. By slowing evolution, vaccination increased the social benefit and decreased the private benefit. Thus, in the long term, vaccinations potential social and private benefits may differ from current theory, which omits evolutionary effects. These results suggest that conventional seasonal vaccines against influenza, if protective against transmission and given to the appropriate populations, could further reduce disease burden by slowing antigenic evolution.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 5%
10.3%
2
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
10.3%
3
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
9.9%
4
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.3%
5
Evolution, Medicine, and Public Health
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
6
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
7
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
8
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
9
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 10%
3.5%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
11
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.7%
12
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 36%
2.0%
13
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.9%
14
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
15
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.7%
16
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
17
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.6%
18
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.5%
19
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
20
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
21
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.2%
22
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.2%
23
Evolutionary Applications
91 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
24
Journal of Virology
456 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
25
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.9%
26
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.9%
27
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
28
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
29
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.7%
30
Virus Evolution
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%