Back

Data Reuse and the Social Capital of Open Science

Alicea, B.

2019-10-01 scientific communication and education
10.1101/093518 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Participation in open data initiatives require two semi-independent actions: the sharing of data produced by a researcher or group, and a consumer of shared data. Consumers of shared data range from people interested in validating the results of a given study to people who actively transform the available data. These data transformers are of particular interest because they add value to the shared data set through the discovery of new relationships and information which can in turn be shared with the same community. The complex and often reciprocal relationship between producers and consumers can be better understood using game theory, namely by using three variations of the Prisoners Dilemma (PD): a classical PD payoff matrix, a simulation of the PD n-person iterative model that tests three hypotheses, and an Ideological Game Theory (IGT) model used to formulate how sharing strategies might be implemented in a specific institutional culture. To motivate these analyses, data sharing is presented as a trade-off between economic and social payoffs. This is demonstrated as a series of payoff matrices describing situations ranging from ubiquitous acceptance of Open Science principles to a community standard of complete non-cooperation. Further context is provided through the IGT model, which allows from the modeling of cultural biases and beliefs that influence open science decision-making. A vision for building a CC-BY economy are then discussed using an approach called econosemantics, which complements the treatment of data sharing as a complex system of transactions enabled by social capital.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 8%
19.9%
2
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.7%
3
Entropy
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.7%
4
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 5%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
5
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.1%
6
The European Physical Journal Plus
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.1%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.7%
8
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.4%
9
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
10
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
46 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
11
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 37%
1.9%
12
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
13
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.3%
14
Mathematical Biosciences
42 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
15
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
16
Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology
54 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
17
Biosystems
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
18
FEBS Letters
42 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
19
Journal of Cell Biology
333 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
20
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
21
IEEE Access
31 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
22
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
23
BioSystems
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
24
Statistics in Medicine
34 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
25
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
26
Neuroscience of Consciousness
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
27
Artificial Intelligence in the Life Sciences
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
28
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
29
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
30
Ecological Informatics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%