Back

Genetic ancestry shapes context-dependent immune regulation across Indigenous South American populations

Choy, C.; Vicuna, L.; Patino, M.; Araujo, D. S.; Obispo, D.; Guevara-Fujita, M. L.; Fonseca, S.; Scariot, D.; Araujo, C.; Guerreiro, J. R.; Acosta, O.; Johnson, C.; Meier, K.; Dumaine, A.; Williams, K.; Lima, T.; Rodrigues, T.; Khayat, A.; Wu, E.; Gupta, A.; Aguirre-Gamboa, R.; Chak, B.; Barroso-Batista, J.; Capetillo, F.; Marcelain, K.; Fuentes, I.; Gonzalez, J.; Beltran, P.; Flores, Y.; Coronel, T.; Latorre, J.; Boutaud, J.; Mickelson, C. K.; Langlois, R.; Scott, E.; Guerreiro, J.; Hünemeier, T.; Fujita, R.; Barreiro, L. B.

2026-10-21 genetic and genomic medicine
10.64898/2026.10.21.26365630 medRxiv
Show abstract

Human immune responses remain poorly characterized across Indigenous South American (ISA) populations, limiting our understanding of human immune variation. Here, we generated a single-cell transcriptional atlas of 1.4 million peripheral blood mononuclear cells from 345 individuals representing 13 South American populations, profiled at baseline and following stimulation with lipopolysaccharide, influenza A virus, or Trypanosoma cruzi. Genetic ancestry was associated with the expression of a large fraction of the transcriptome, often only after stimulation, and explained more variation than age or sex. On average, cis-eQTLs accounted for one-quarter of these ancestry-associated differences. Thousands of regulatory variants were common in ISA populations but rare or absent in European reference datasets. Integrating eQTLs with GWAS revealed stimulation-specific disease-associated regulatory variants and an enrichment of ancestry-associated expression differences among genes with colocalizing signals. Our findings highlight the importance of studying diverse populations across immune contexts to understand the genetic architecture of human immune responses.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.