Implicit reconstruction of gating strategies from sample-level flow cytometry annotations
Buser, M.; Szczepanowski, M.; Laqua, A.; Chitadze, G.; Baldus, C.; Brueggemann, M.; Marr, C.
Show abstract
Flow cytometry is central to clinical hematology, generating extensive archives comprising billions of single-cell profiles linked to expert-derived diagnostic summaries. While these records represent a largely untapped repository of collective expert knowledge, the underlying single-cell annotations required for supervised machine learning are typically not recorded in a standardized, accessible format. We present IMPGAT (implicit gating), a weakly supervised multiple-instance learning framework that reconstructs single-cell gating strategies directly from existing sample-level cell-type frequency distributions. The model utilizes an induced set attention mechanism to map single-cell marker profiles to specific cell populations, requiring neither explicit cell-level labels nor unsupervised clustering during training. We evaluate the framework on acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cohorts, totaling 711 measurements from 268 individuals and 240 million single cells. In ALL, the model's quantification of cell-type abundances shows no statistically significant difference from human inter-expert variability. In AML, the framework achieves blast quantification on par with a recently established supervised state-of-the-art model that relies on explicit single-cell annotations for training. Error analysis shows that mismatches between model predictions and expert gating primarily involve expert-labeled non-cellular events, reflecting the non-incorporation of any explicit physical prior knowledge (such as the geometric relationships traditionally used to identify doublets and debris in scatter cytograms) in model training. Conversely, model certainty correlates with phenotypic borderline cases where manual bisection is inherently difficult. Our approach enables the systematic utilization of retrospective clinical records for the development of automated, standardized gating logic and is applicable to broader high-throughput contexts, such as large-scale immune monitoring or phenotypic drug screening.
Matching journals
The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Chromatin mapping and single-cell immune profiling define the temporal dynamics of ibrutinib drug response in chronic lymphocytic leukemia 92%
- Community assessment of methods to deconvolve cellular composition from bulk gene expression 92%
- mcRigor: a statistical method to enhance the rigor of metacell partitioning in single-cell data analysis 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- SuperCellCyto: enabling efficient analysis of large scale cytometry datasets 93%
- CaClust: linking genotype to transcriptional heterogeneity of follicular lymphoma using BCR and exomic variants 93%
- Integrating temporal single-cell gene expression modalities for trajectory inference and disease prediction 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- cytoGPNet: Enhancing Clinical Outcome Prediction Accuracy Using Longitudinal Cytometry Data in Small Cohort Studies 93%
- Knowledge transfer to enhance the performance of deep learning models for automated classification of B-cell neoplasms 93%
- DAISM-DNNXMBD: Highly accurate cell type proportion estimation with in silico data augmentation and deep neural networks 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.