Back

Expanding Kelch13 artemisinin resistance markers are associated with higher malaria incidence in Uganda

van Wyk, S.; Gwasupika, J.; Mapahla, L.; Asua, V.; Harrison, L. E.; Kamya, M. R.; Nankabirwa, J. I.; Barnes, K. I.

2026-10-20 infectious diseases
10.64898/2026.10.19.26365887 medRxiv
Show abstract

Artemisinin partial resistance (ART R) associated Plasmodium falciparum Kelch13 mutations is expanding across Africa. However, their population level consequences remain poorly understood, particularly in settings of moderate to high malaria transmission. We investigated associations between Kelch13 and partner drug mutation prevalence and monthly confirmed malaria incidence across 16 Ugandan districts from 2017 to 2022, using integrated molecular, epidemiological, climatic, malaria control, and antimalarial resistance data and negative binomial regression. Combined prevalence of WHO validated and candidate Kelch13 mutations increased over the study period. Each 10 percentage point increase in Kelch13 prevalence was associated with a 13.1% higher incidence after multivariable adjustment (aIRR 1.131, 95% CI 1.090 to 1.174). Furthermore, each 10% increase in pfcrt K76T was associated with a 24% increase in malaria transmission. As expected, ITN distribution >80%, IRS coverage >90%, and higher altitude were associated with lower incidence, whereas temperatures of 25 to 30C, relative humidity of 60 to 80%, and higher precipitation were associated with higher incidence. The persistence of the Kelch13 and pfcrt K76T association after adjustment suggests that expanding ART R associated parasite populations are independently associated with malaria incidence. The relationship may be bidirectional. These findings support interpreting ART R within its ecological and intervention context and integrating molecular, epidemiological, and malaria control surveillance to safeguard antimalarial efficacy.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.