Back

Documented Dental Disease in Patients With Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia

Ssentongo, P.; Peacock, W. F.; Durieux, J. C.; Colovos, C.

2026-10-20 dentistry and oral medicine
10.64898/2026.10.18.26365833 medRxiv
Show abstract

Importance: Clinicians often look for a dental source in Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB), but how often dental disease is found, compared with other bacteremias, is unclear. Objective: To compare documented dental disease in adults with SAB, Escherichia coli bacteremia, and a general population cohort. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective cohort study in the Protege database of 48 975 adults with bacteremia from January 1, 2015, through December 31, 2023, assigned by earliest in-window organism, and 81 945 general population adults. Exposures: SAB, with E coli bacteremia as the primary comparator and the general population as the secondary comparator. Main Outcomes and Measures: Documented dental disease from 7 days before through 30 days after index, defined by a qualifying dental procedure or disease-specific note text and adjusted for age, sex, race, and documentation intensity. Results: Dental disease occurred in 528 of 16 435 patients with SAB (3.21%) and 179 of 24 942 patients with E coli bacteremia (0.72%). The adjusted odds ratio was 3.86 (95% CI, 3.23 to 4.63). By the pathology-only definition, disease occurred in 517 patients with SAB (3.15%) and 399 general population patients (0.49%). The adjusted odds ratio was 3.71 (95% CI, 3.08 to 4.46). Within SAB, rates were highest with prior infective endocarditis (9.8%), opioid use disorder (6.2%), injection drug use (5.3%), and prosthetic valve (5.0%). Prevalence ranged from 0.49% in the general population to 7.98% in other streptococcal bacteremia. Of 437 patients with SAB and an assignable first finding date, 333 (76.2%) had the finding after the index date. Conclusions and Relevance: Dental disease was documented more often in SAB than in E coli bacteremia after adjustment. Most findings were first recorded after bacteremia was recognized, during SAB evaluation. These data do not show that dental disease caused the bacteremia.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.