Prognostic significance of the C-reactive protein-albumin-lymphocyte (CALLY) index in primary lung malignancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis with GRADE assessment
Shamohammadi, M.; Yarahmadi, D.; Naseri Rad, F.; Patel, I.; Yarahmadi, M.; Rashidi, A.; Yarahmadi, A.; Kordestani Moghadam, P.; Naghavi, N.
Show abstract
Background: The C-reactive protein-albumin-lymphocyte (CALLY) index integrates systemic inflammation, nutritional status, and immune function. We evaluated its association with survival in primary lung malignancies. Methods: Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched from inception to 18 September 2026. Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality In Prognosis Studies tool. Hazard ratios (HRs) were synthesized using random-effects models with restricted maximum likelihood estimation and Hartung-Knapp adjustment. Sensitivity analyses, subgroup analyses, and meta-regression examined robustness and heterogeneity. Results: Eleven studies contributed 13 cohorts to the overall survival (OS) analysis and 8 cohorts from seven studies to a combined recurrence/progression-free survival (RFS/PFS) analysis. Lower CALLY was associated with poorer OS (HR 1.78, 95% CI 1.49-2.12; I2=71.6%) and poorer RFS/PFS (HR 1.60, 95% CI 1.40-1.84; I2=0%). Associations persisted in leave-one-out analyses. No statistically significant subgroup differences were detected. Funnel-plot asymmetry suggested small-study effects for OS and RFS/PFS. Seven studies had moderate and four had high overall risk of bias. The certainty of evidence was rated as low for both OS and RFS/PFS, primarily due to risk of bias, heterogeneity, and endpoint indirectness. Conclusion: Lower CALLY was associated with adverse survival outcomes in the current synthesis. Methodological limitations and variation in biomarker measurement and endpoint definitions restrict interpretation. Prospective validation using standardized measurements and clinically coherent outcomes is needed to establish incremental prognostic value and clinical utility. Keywords: CALLY index; lung cancer; prognosis; overall survival; systematic review; meta-analysis
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploring Hypoxia-Related Genes as Prognostic Indicators in Lung Adenocarcinoma 91%
- A Core Outcome Set to evaluate the impact of prognostication in people living with advanced cancer: an international consensus study 90%
- Can we predict the severe course of COVID-19 – a systematic review and meta-analysis of indicators of clinical outcome? 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- From Symptom to Outcome: Defining Clinically Meaningful Patient-Reported Appetite Loss in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer 89%
- Severity Of Lung Obstruction And Older Age, But Not Physical Activity, Predict Locomotor Muscle Oxidative Impairment In COPD 87%
- Muscle Strength and Muscle Mass as Predictors of Hospital Length of Stay in Patients with Moderate to Severe COVID-19: A Prospective Observational Study 85%
Similar papers in this journal
- Construction and Validation of a Nomogram Based on the Log Odds of Positive Lymph Based on the Log Odds of Positive Lymph Nodes to Predict the Prognosis of Lung Neuroendocrine Tumors 89%
- Up-regulated tumor intrinsic growth potential and decreased immune function orchestrate the evolution of lung adenocarcinoma 88%
- Definition of a new blood cell count (BCT) score for early survival prediction for non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with atezolizumab: Integrated analysis of 4 multicenter clinical trials 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- A consideration of publication-derived immune-related associations in Coronavirus and related lung damaging diseases 90%
- Tocilizumab for patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. The TOCIVID-19 prospective phase 2 trial 85%
- Systematic Review of the Registered Clinical Trials of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) 84%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Efficacy of IL-6 Inhibitor Tocilizumab in Reducing Severe COVID-19 Mortality: A Systematic Review 87%
- COVID-19 Mortality in Cancer Patients: A Report from a Tertiary Cancer Centre in India 86%
- EsoDetect: Computational Validation and Algorithm Development of a Novel Diagnostic and Prognostic Tool for Dysplasia in Barrett’s Esophagus 85%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.