A Toolkit for Health-economic Analysis with Language-Agnostic Simulation and Sensitivity Analysis (THALASSA)
Gomez-Guillen, D.; Fernandez-Lopez, D.; Cerquides, J.; Arcos, J. L.; Diaz, M.
Show abstract
Background: Cost-effectiveness analyses (CEA) built on simulation models are usually delivered through project-specific scripts. Each new model, and often each new question, rebuilds the same scaffolding: parameter management, calibration, base-case analysis, sensitivity analysis and export. This is costly, and is where traceability between an estimate and the model version producing it is lost. We present THALASSA, a web application providing this infrastructure once, for any model satisfying a small programming contract. Methods: A simulation model is connected by one file implementing a fixed contract of R functions that determine its behaviour. THALASSA exposes the complete CEA workflow in a browser: a generated overview of the connected model, parameter editing, calibration, base-case comparison with the efficiency curve, and deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analysis at a willingness-to-pay threshold, each with timestamped file export carrying the parameter values it was run with. Every session is bound to a repository version, so results carry their generating model version. Results: We demonstrate THALASSA on two public models of contrasting difficulty: a simple tutorial model and a generic cancer screening model with two competing natural-history pathways and a 21-dimensional calibration deliberately built to be more complex. Both ran on the same unmodified setup, implementing the same contract, with no code changes. Conclusions: Separating analysis infrastructure from model logic makes the CEA workflow reusable across projects and reproducible by construction. A modelling team can move from a versioned repository to audit-ready, exportable CEA outputs without writing analysis code. The integration effort does not grow with model size and one installation serves unrelated projects.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A Tutorial on Discrete Event Simulation Models in R Using a Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Example 93%
- A novel decision modeling framework for health policy analyses when outcomes are influenced by social and disease processes 90%
- Multilevel and Quasi Monte Carlo methods for the calculation of the Expected Value of Partial Perfect Information 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- A flexible formula for incorporating distributive concerns into cost-effectiveness analyses: priority weights 93%
- Analysis of clinical trial registry entry histories using the novel R package cthist 93%
- Exploring scalable assessment methods for terminated trials in ClinicalTrials.gov: A cohort analysis of German and Californian trials 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A modular pipeline for natural language processing-screened human abstraction of a pragmatic trial outcome from electronic health records 92%
- Dynamic methods for ongoing assessment of site-level risk in risk-based monitoring of clinical trials: a scoping review 91%
- Use of estimands in cluster randomised trials: a review 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.