Back

Sequence-based variant-effect predictions reveal trait-specific regulatory-layer profiles of complex-trait heritability

Choi, B. H.; Jeong, J.

2026-10-19 genetic and genomic medicine
10.64898/2026.10.16.26365786 medRxiv
Show abstract

Partitioned-heritability studies have shown which tissues carry the heritability of complex traits, but whether the regulatory layer whose annotations are most informative for heritability within a tissue differs between traits has not been tested, because measured annotations for different layers come from different sets of biosamples. Sequence-to-function models predict the allelic effect of every variant on several regulatory layers with a single model, so that layers can be compared on the same variants within the same tissues. We grouped AlphaGenome Atlas predictions into 12 lineages and six regulatory layers and partitioned the heritability of 11 complex traits with stratified LD score regression. Traits localized largely to the expected lineages, and within these lineages the most informative predicted layer differed between traits (P = 3.6 x 10^-8). Predicted chromatin-accessibility (DNase) effects were the most informative for height and bone mineral density, whereas predicted transcription-initiation (CAGE) effects were the most informative for Alzheimer's disease, most brain traits and cholesterol levels. The difference persisted across sensitivity analyses, and the predicted contrast held for three related traits whose layers had been predicted in advance (P = 2 x 10^-7). Predicted CAGE effects also remained informative after conditioning on fine-mapped eQTLs and measured regulatory annotations. These results identify differences across traits in the heritability information captured by predicted regulatory layers and offer testable hypotheses for investigating the regulatory basis of complex traits.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.