Predictors of methadone response in chronic neuropathic pain
Barbosa, M. M.; Pentiado, J. A. M.; Kubota, G.; Martins, P. N.; Moreira, L. I.; Fernandes, A. M.; da Silva, V. A.; Junior, J. R.; Figueiredo, E. G.; Yeng, L. T.; Teixeira, M. J.; de Andrade, D. C.
Show abstract
Background: Although opioids are frequently prescribed for refractory chronic neuropathic pain, few data are available on baseline factors that may identify individuals more likely to respond and inform individually tailored practice. Methods: This was a post hoc, exploratory analysis of individual-level data from a placebo-controlled trial of methadone for chronic neuropathic pain (NCT05235191). Baseline clinical, psychological, psychophysical and radiological variables were tested for association with 30% or more pain reduction in the methadone group. The correlation between expectation of improvement and pain reduction was examined in both groups. Results: Of the 81 participants completing the 8-week follow-up, 28 (70%) on methadone and 14 (34.1%) on placebo achieved 30% or more pain reduction. In the methadone group, responders had higher baseline expectation of improvement (median 100 [80-100] vs. 55 [50-81]; p=0.004), which correlated moderately with percentage pain reduction (rs=0.508; p<0.001). Neither finding was observed in the placebo group (p=0.211 and p=0.161, respectively), although the correlation did not differ significantly between groups (p for interaction=0.728). Other clinical, sociodemographic, psychological and psychophysical variables were not associated with response. In the subsample with peripheral neuropathic pain and structural MRI (n=37), lower left precentral cortex volume was associated with response to methadone (p=0.041), and lower right paracentral volume with response to placebo (p=0.003). Conclusions: Baseline expectation may influence treatment outcomes, supporting its inclusion as a covariate to improve the precision of treatment effect estimates in trials, and its use in clinical practice to help tailor treatment to individual patients. These exploratory findings require confirmation in larger studies.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Neural effects of placebo analgesia in fibromyalgia patients and healthy individuals 94%
- The Contribution of Circulating Endocannabinoid Tone to Individual Differences in Human Pain Sensitivity: A Quantitative Sensory Testing Study 92%
- Brain dysfunction in chronic pain patients assessed by resting-state electroencephalography 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effects of Centrally Acting Analgesics on Resting-State Electroencephalography Biomarker Candidates of Chronic Pain 93%
- Peritraumatic C-reactive protein levels predict pain outcomes following traumatic stress exposure in a sex-dependent manner 92%
- Improving Power and Accuracy in Randomized Controlled Trials of Pain Treatments by Accounting for Concurrent Analgesic Use 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Hyper-connectivity between the left motor cortex and prefrontal cortex is associated with the severity of dysfunction of the descending pain modulatory system in fibromyalgia 93%
- Trends of long-term opioid therapy and subsequent discontinuation among people with chronic non-cancer pain in UK primary care: a retrospective cohort study 93%
- Interventions to reduce opioid use for patients with chronic non-cancer pain in primary care settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Regionally diffuse muscle pain-hypersensitivity in humans during acute muscle pain 91%
- Tissue damage-induced axon injury-associated responses in sensory neurons - requirements, prevention, and potential role in persistent post-surgical pain 91%
- Autonomic Nervous System Markers of Music-Elicited Analgesia in People with Fibromyalgia: A Double-Blind Randomized Pilot Study 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.