Back

Narrow Is Slow: CT-Derived Anatomic Isthmus 3 Width and Arrhythmogenic Substrate in Repaired Tetralogy of Fallot

Kosmopoulos, M.; Liskov, S.; Amir, R.; Berger, R. D.; Cedars, A.; Chehab, O.; Chrispin, J.; Fisher, S.; Fuller, S.; Fraint, H.; Armstrong, A. K.; Ziakas, I.; Aronis, K. N.

2026-10-19 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.10.16.26365751 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Anatomic isthmus 3 (AI 3) is defined as the myocardium between the pulmonary valve annulus and the ventricular septal defect patch that persists after tetralogy of Fallot (ToF) repair. Ventricular tachycardia (VT) propagated through slow conducting AI 3 (SCAI 3) represents a significant cause of morbidity in ToF. There is an unmet need for non-invasive identification of SCAI 3 in patients with ToF. Objectives: To assess whether the anatomic features of AI 3 as derived from cardiac computed tomography (CT) can predict slow conduction velocity during EP study. Methods: This retrospective single-center study included patients with ToF who underwent an electrophysiologic study and had AI 3 width measured from the pre-procedure cardiac CT. All patients underwent programmed ventricular stimulation, and electroanatomic. Logistic regression was performed to assess the relationship between AI 3 width and the presence of SCAI 3. Results: Of 27 consecutive patients with ToF, twelve patients were found to have SCAI 3, and ten patients were found to have SCAI 3 mediated VT. The AI 3 was significantly narrower in patients with SCAI 3 compared to those with normal AI 3 conduction (18.4 +/- 6.6 mm vs. 29.2 +/- 9.0 mm; p = 0.001). An AI 3 width above 21.5 mm carried a negative predictive value of 80.0%. Conclusion: In adults with repaired ToF referred for electrophysiology study, a narrower CT-derived AI 3 width was associated with SCAI 3 identification. AI 3 width measured on a CT obtained before PV replacement could help guide invasive risk stratification.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.